GREPhysics.NET
GR | #
<< Previous | Next >>
Login | Register
   
  GR9677 #57
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
This problem is still being typed.
Optics}Diffractions

The single slit diffraction formula is d \sin \theta = \lambda m, where one has integer m for maxima and half-integers for minima. (Opposite to single-slit interference.)

Given m=1, \theta = 4E-3 rad, \lambda = 400E-9 m, and making the approximation \sin \theta \approx \theta for small angles, one has the following equation for d,

d\approx \frac{\lambda m}{\theta} = \frac{4E-7}{4E-3}=1E-4, as in choice (C).

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
scottopoly
2006-11-03 19:39:18		Use Raleigh's criterion!Alternate Solution - Unverified
Comments
faith
2010-11-11 19:33:52		id like to also point out.

no need to convert radian to degree. if u do so, u have to use sin teta and... its impossible to get the value without memorising the sin table.

unlike me.. i did this with a calculator. hahar.. 		Common Pitfalls
gman
2010-11-10 18:20:37		Just to clarify...

d sin(\theta) = m \lambda with integer, non-zero m giving successive minima.

m=1 \Rightarrow first minimum.
\theta = 0 \Rightarrow central maximum.

So d=\frac{400nm}{4E-3} = 1E-4
scasplte2
2011-09-01 18:59:14		 This made it so much clearer to me... thank you
sina2
2013-09-30 00:28:24		 Better answer.
NEC
azureblue22
2010-11-05 21:33:36		For all you guys who disagree about the factor of two I have your answer.

There is also a factor of two hidden in the distance {d}, allow me to explain.rnrnFor single slit diffraction the diffraction pattern emerges. because the photons interfere with each other as they pass through the single slit. For a minimum to occur each photon must be \pi radians out of phase with another photon passing through the slit. One way to count the out of phase pairs is to divide the slit in two at \frac{d}{2}. Pair the photon at the very bottom of the slit with the photon in the middle of the slit, then think of these two locations as two separate, infinitesimally small slits. Wa-lah! Were back to the double slit pattern! Now move the single slit very far away from the basement wall where you measured the double slit pattern in undergraduate lab. The slit becomes a point and you get familiar results. And look on the bright side, you are never going to see that wall again because you're going off to grad school. Good luck.

P.S. So you see, the formula becomes: \frac{d}{2}{=sin}\theta\frac{\lambda}{2}.		NEC
azureblue22
2010-11-05 21:32:23		For all you guys who disagree about the factor of two I have your answer. There is also a factor of two hidden in the distance {d}, allow me to explain.rnrnFor single slit diffraction the diffraction pattern emerges. because the photons interfere with each other as they pass through the single slit. For a minimum to occur each photon must be \pi radians out of phase with another photon passing through the slit. One way to count the out of phase pairs is to divide the slit in two at \frac{d}{2}. Pair the photon at the very bottom of the slit with the photon in the middle of the slit, then think of these two locations as two separate, infinitesimally small slits. Wa-lah! Were back to the double slit pattern! Now move the single slit very far away from the basement wall where you measured the double slit pattern in undergraduate lab. The slit becomes a point and you get familiar results. And look on the bright side, you are never going to see that wall again because you're going off to grad school. Good luck. rnrnP.S. So you see, the formula becomes: \frac{d}{2}{=sin}\theta\frac{\lambda}{2}.NEC
mianghazanfar786
2010-07-20 18:17:20		There is a confusion that "one has integer m for maxima and half-integers for minima. (Opposite to single-slit interference.)"

We should use directly for diffraction pattern,
1 for minima and 1/2 for maxima so we use m=1
to solve the question by Bragg's Diffraction law		NEC
archard
2010-05-30 13:20:12		If all you knew was that minima occur at half integers, you could make a wild guess by noticing that C and D differ by a factor of a half, and since ETS is always trying to trick you it's probably one of the two, and most likely C because 1 is half of 2.NEC
sullx
2009-11-02 18:39:02		Careful! The value 'm' corresponds to Minimum for single slit diffraction, and maximum for double slit interference.

Yosun: "The single slit diffraction formula is d \sin \theta = \lambda m, where one has integer m for maxima and half-integers for minima. (Opposite to single-slit interference.) "
niux
2009-11-05 14:15:02		 Gee. Seems Yosun using different semantics?. I agree with RootMeanSquare explanation, and for single slit, m should tell the number of minima you are dealing with.
NEC
tan
2009-10-23 23:09:13		Central maximum occurs at \theta = 0
First minimum occurs at d sin \theta = \lambda /2
Answer should be 5 x \10^-5.
What's wrong?		NEC
boundforthefloor
2006-11-24 23:43:14		Wolfram explains this well giving minima at Sin(\theta) = m\lambda/d and the primary maxima at 0.

see:

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/FraunhoferDiffractionSingleSlit.html
physicsisgod
2008-10-29 22:12:18		 Yea, you can think of it like the center max is actually at \frac{d}{2}, and then the optical path difference between a ray diffracted at an angle \theta at the center (\frac{d}{2}), and one at 0, is \frac {\lambda}{2} if there's a minimum (destructive inteference), and that has to be equal to \frac{dsin\theta}{2}.
NEC
RootMeanSquare
2006-11-24 14:31:54		Okay, I'll never remember that I don't have to log in before posting...

Anyway: It seems here is a little confusion about the factor 2. d sin \theta gives you the optical retardation between waves originating a distance d apart within the slit. For a full minimum, you need to find a pair of beams that cancel each other out for every point within the slit, i.e. you actually need a optical retardation of \lambda/2 for point d/2 apart. Hence you end up with \lambda /\alpha as the width of the slit.
mhas035
2007-03-25 21:54:27		 Thanks! Some clarity!
NEC
RootMeanSquare
2006-11-24 14:25:50		NEC
scottopoly
2006-11-03 19:39:18		Use Raleigh's criterion!
physicsisgod
2008-10-29 22:04:35		 For those of you who are not as enlightened as our fortunate friend scottopoly, Raleigh's Criterion is a formula for deriving the distance between two point sources necessary to resolve them, given their angular separation, \alpha_{s}, and the wavelength of emitted light, \lambda. The formula is

\alpha_{s} = \frac{1.22 \lambda}{d}

But Raleigh's Criterion only applies for a circular slit, thus the factor of 1.22. If you just use the regular old equation for the distance between the center maximum and the first minimum given a single slit diffraction,

\lambda m = d sin\theta,

and the small angle approximation, you'll derive the same formula without the 1.22 factor

Source: http://www.ux1.eiu.edu/~cfadd/3050/Ch20WO/OpRes.html
apr2010
2010-04-06 14:20:00		 Very nice, also makes me remembering the raileigh criterion!
Alternate Solution - Unverified
buddy.epson
2006-10-13 16:01:42		Re: Previous User Comment

For single slit diffraction, m corresponds to the center of the dark band (minima). For multiple slits and x-ray diffraction, it corresponds to the center of the bright bands (maxima). The posted solution is correct.
pablojm
2006-10-28 14:39:50		 In fact, nahmad is right and the problem is incorrectly worded. You can check in any optics book that the formula for minima is d(theta)=m(lambda), where m is a half-integer. Plugging in m=0 and the given values for (lambda) and (theta), you get answer B. The mistake in the original solution is that you stated that m should be a half-integer for minima, and then you plugged in m=1.

Cheers,

Pablo
f4hy
2009-04-03 17:37:10		 The problem states angle between the first minimum and the central max. Not the angle between two mins.
NEC
nahmad
2006-03-31 22:40:22		I don't understand. The problems gives the angle between the first minimum and the central max. Doesn't that correspond to m=1/2 which leads to d = 5 x 10^-5 which is B?
suyq
2010-11-07 19:59:33		 I think B is the right answer!
nimesh.nic
2011-11-01 01:20:14		 I think this is the right ans ...please someone explain .....

Answered Question!

Post A Comment!
You are replying to:
There is a confusion that "one has integer m for maxima and half-integers for minima. (Opposite to single-slit interference.)" We should use directly for diffraction pattern, 1 for minima and 1/2 for maxima so we use m=1 to solve the question by Bragg's Diffraction law

Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...

All-Solutions List | Latest Comments | Unanswered Questions (Cries for Help!) |::| About

© 2005-2007 by Yosun Chang, All rights reserved.

This site is not affiliated with ETS, nor is it officially endorsed (yet) by ETS. This site is the work of an individual named Yosun Chang. The solutions, sans user comments and ETS questions, are © 2005 by Yosun Chang except where noted. All rights reserved. / The comments appending particular solutions are due to the respective users. / Educational Testing Service, ETS, the ETS logo, Graduate Record Examinations, and GRE are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service. The examination questions are © 1997 and © 2001 by ETS.