|
GR9677 #85 |
|
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
| There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one! |
|
|
Comments |
socks 2008-09-17 10:06:09 | No explicit knowledge of the modes in the limit is necessary.
From the limit we see that there must be modes for where n is a positive integer. This narrows the choices down to B, C, or D. Choice D is ruled out immediately as we suspect there must be a dependence on the mass of the ring.
In the limit, we see that C allows for no modes since the LHS goes to infinity and the RHS is bounded (except for ). The only physical intuition required to obtain choice B is that there must still exist standing modes even for a massless ring. |  | FortranMan 2008-09-03 17:07:15 | for me, the first key was to realize that rapid movement of the string (short wavelength) would require a light ring mass, hence . Then remember and corresponds to components of the wave. |  | panos85 2007-10-23 01:32:08 | There is a (minor) inaccuracy in this solution. As M goes to we have nodes on both sides so every wavelength of the form with k=1,2,... is acceptable. (Remember the standing waves.) In a similar way, when M=0, every wavelength of the form: with k=0,1,2,... is acceptable. The answer B is the only one that is satisfied when you plug in these values. |  | dumbguy 2007-10-18 21:52:06 | can we still get a better explanation why when M goes to zero lambda=L/4 |  | Mexicana 2007-10-05 14:36:55 | I think there's a mistake in the relation for the fundamental harmonic that you are quoting. Instead this should be for (open end) and for (closed end). In this way the limiting conditions are both satisfied by choice (B) |  | cyberdeathreaper 2007-02-04 19:53:47 | Also, can someone explain why the wavelength is 4L when M approaches zero?
hamood 2007-04-11 21:36:40 |
when m approaches zero
node on the left and antinode on the right
L = lambda/4
wavelength = 4L
|
|  | cyberdeathreaper 2007-02-04 19:43:37 | It's unclear to me why the wavelengths of the standing waves have to be of any specified value. For example, when M approaches infinity, the wavelength could be 2L, L, 2L/3, etc...
hamood 2007-04-11 21:39:14 |
when m is very large you have nodes on both ends
|
|  | chri5tina 2006-11-28 06:23:44 | answer A) has a cotangent in it, not a cosine. |  | buddy.epson 2006-10-14 14:18:57 | With M>>mu, lambda=2L, as the antinode is in the center at L/2. That gives the term tan(pi)=0, what you want for the limiting case in (b). |  | alpha 2005-11-07 01:51:52 | Good idea. |  |
|
| Post A Comment! |
|
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
| type this... |
to get... |
| $\int_0^\infty$ |
 |
| $\partial$ |
 |
| $\Rightarrow$ |
 |
| $\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
 |
| $\sqrt{z}$ |
 |
| $\langle my \rangle$ |
 |
| $\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
_{me}) |
| $\vec{E}$ |
 |
| $\frac{a}{b}$ |
 |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|
|