|
GR9277 #65
|
|
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
daschaich 2005-11-11 16:55:28 | Oh dear. Looks like I missed a dollar sign or backslash or something. Let's try this again...
(A) and (B) have dimensions of , (C) has dimensions of , (D) has dimensions of and only (E) has dimensions of appropriate for a frequency. |  |
|
|
Comments |
violet 2008-10-19 20:04:50 | |  | FortranMan 2008-10-01 20:02:42 | recall the period for an oscillating pendulum, sort out the analogies for acceleration and length, invert, and BOOM, problem solved. |  | madfish 2007-11-01 11:09:08 | Thanks, daschaich your solution seems the fastest, I doubt I would think to look at the differential motion equation as I would assume the y-components of this system would cancel by symmetry. |  | 94709 2007-10-22 23:42:37 | Not sure what "compensating" means for me. A bit detailed solution;
When a charge is along -axis, and when it is at very close to the origin (which is the case for small oscillation), let be an angle between two lines; x-axis and a line connecting and .
Then, by small angle approximation,

The distance between and is, therefore,

Magnitude of force on charge by ONE along y-axis is, therefore,

Using Newton's 2nd Law (or SHO differential equation),
^{\frac{1}{2}})
Hence, choice (E). All this can be done in a minute for sure, but dimentional analysis is strongly recommended as daschaich mentions.
|  | nitin 2006-11-20 03:39:20 | Magnitude of force acting on charge -q:
.
Now,
,
so that
.
The answer (E) follows.
georgi 2007-08-26 21:02:10 |
i don't think this solutions works even though it gives the right answer since you are using the formula for circular motion and centripetal acceleration.
|
neutrinosrule 2008-10-04 18:40:03 |
I'm only saying this because you did get the right answer, but it sort of makes sense (even though it's not circular motion) because oscillations are similar to circular motion... the shadow of an object in vertical circular motion is often used to introduce oscillations. The time it takes for an object to get from one side of a circle to the other in circular motion would be the same as the time for an oscillation, so since we're dealing with frequency, maybe this is a correct way to simplify and approximate this problem...
|
conrad 2009-11-03 19:58:29 |
Remember that and . Therefore . Memorizing this relation saves lots of time. This is a great approach to the problem.
|
|  | daschaich 2005-11-11 16:55:28 | Oh dear. Looks like I missed a dollar sign or backslash or something. Let's try this again...
(A) and (B) have dimensions of , (C) has dimensions of , (D) has dimensions of and only (E) has dimensions of appropriate for a frequency.
daschaich 2005-11-11 16:52:45 |
Can also be done using dimensional analysis. Since , (A) and (B) have dimensions of , (C) has dimensions of , (D) has dimensions of sqrt{length}}{time} \frac{1}{time}$ appropriate for a frequency.
|
jmason86 2009-09-06 16:19:13 |
word up. This is the best way to solve this problem under time pressure.
|
koppes 2009-10-31 14:07:08 |
What is the result of dimensional analysis for Coulombs or Amps?
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|