GR8677 #77
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
ethanque 2015-08-12 08:54:41 | Hooke's Law and Work Energy Theorem:
I couldn't remember my wave equations right away so I used the work energy theorem imagining this is a SHO/spring:
The particle has zero kinetic energy when , and it is subject to the force as it travels from to . i.e. the spring does work on the particle.
So, integrate
Recall that . Then
Recall that . Then
, which is option (B).
Badda-bing badda-boom! | | wittensdog 2009-10-07 18:32:43 | Yet another solution...
You can easily find that the argument of the sine function must be 1/2. If you know the value of a sine function at one point, you immediately know the value of cosine, since,
cos^2 + sin^2 = 1 ==>
cos = sqrt ( 1 - sin^2 ) ==>
cos = sqrt(3) / 2
which then you just plug right into the velocity formula. It's similar to the original solution, but you don't need to remember what angles correspond to what values of sine and cosine. | | lattes 2008-08-07 13:08:18 | Another to solve is: consider Let and . Squaring both equation and summing them we get: . Now let and solve for . Thus . (you should remember that !). A little bit longer solution, but it works. | | rreyes 2005-10-31 08:06:24 | an alternative solution is conservation of energy
1/2kA^2=1/2kx^2+1/2mv^2
plugging in x=A/2 gives
v= \sqrt{3k/4m}A = \sqrt{3}\pi fA
yosun 2005-11-01 02:14:55 |
fyi, add in dollar-sign wrappers around the equations in your comments... and the system processes your latex-compatible syntax into nifty-looking equations.
quote rreyes:
an alternative solution is conservation of energy
plugging in gives
|
nitin 2006-11-16 13:32:49 |
Thumbs up mate!
|
| |
|
Comments |
ethanque 2015-08-12 08:54:41 | Hooke's Law and Work Energy Theorem:
I couldn't remember my wave equations right away so I used the work energy theorem imagining this is a SHO/spring:
The particle has zero kinetic energy when , and it is subject to the force as it travels from to . i.e. the spring does work on the particle.
So, integrate
Recall that . Then
Recall that . Then
, which is option (B).
Badda-bing badda-boom!
ethanque 2015-08-12 08:58:27 |
WOW! My solution looked fine in the preview. Sorry, for that jumbled mess of latex jargon... help?
|
yosun2015 2015-08-23 06:22:33 |
fixed! :)
|
| | tpatt 2011-09-05 14:08:10 | Can someone explain why (omega*t + phi) = pi/6? I'm not following that step.
livieratos 2011-11-08 06:03:21 |
cause then sin(omega*t + phi) = sin(pi/6) = 1/2 as was given...
|
| | anum 2010-11-11 11:37:29 | v=r*w =2*pi*f*A putting in A/2 in place of A gives v=pi*f* A . but its not correct; can anyone tell why?
IRFAN 2011-08-18 03:19:30 |
this velocity you have determin works only at particular point,in next you find the velocity of a different motion wich have halv the amplitrude
|
| | shafatmubin 2009-11-02 10:17:59 | Simple Harmonic Motion flash card:
x = A cos (wt)
v = w Sqrt(A^2 - x^2)
a = -w^2 x
V = (1/2) k x^2 = (1/2) m w^2 x^2
T = (1/2) m v^2 = (1/2) m w^2 (A^2 - x^2) | | wittensdog 2009-10-07 18:32:43 | Yet another solution...
You can easily find that the argument of the sine function must be 1/2. If you know the value of a sine function at one point, you immediately know the value of cosine, since,
cos^2 + sin^2 = 1 ==>
cos = sqrt ( 1 - sin^2 ) ==>
cos = sqrt(3) / 2
which then you just plug right into the velocity formula. It's similar to the original solution, but you don't need to remember what angles correspond to what values of sine and cosine. | | lattes 2008-08-07 13:08:18 | Another to solve is: consider Let and . Squaring both equation and summing them we get: . Now let and solve for . Thus . (you should remember that !). A little bit longer solution, but it works.
lattes 2008-08-07 13:09:33 |
"Another way to solve the problem is" ....
|
| | rreyes 2005-10-31 08:06:24 | an alternative solution is conservation of energy
1/2kA^2=1/2kx^2+1/2mv^2
plugging in x=A/2 gives
v= \sqrt{3k/4m}A = \sqrt{3}\pi fA
yosun 2005-11-01 02:14:55 |
fyi, add in dollar-sign wrappers around the equations in your comments... and the system processes your latex-compatible syntax into nifty-looking equations.
quote rreyes:
an alternative solution is conservation of energy
plugging in gives
|
nitin 2006-11-16 13:32:49 |
Thumbs up mate!
|
zeper 2013-03-24 11:59:00 |
that is the best one....;)
|
| |
|
Post A Comment! |
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
type this... |
to get... |
$\int_0^\infty$ |
|
$\partial$ |
|
$\Rightarrow$ |
|
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
|
$\sqrt{z}$ |
|
$\langle my \rangle$ |
|
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
|
$\vec{E}$ |
|
$\frac{a}{b}$ |
|
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|