GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR0177 #45
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
This problem is still being typed.
Quantum Mechanics}Simple Harmonic Oscillator

The expectation value is the average value, and it is calculated by \langle \psi | H \psi \rangle. Using orthonormality, one has E=(1/14)(3/2)+(4/14)(5/2)+(9/14)(7/2)\hbar \omega = 43/14 \hbar \omega

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
ramparts
2009-10-07 14:30:21
I made a stupid mistake as well (albeit not the same one as kev and f4hy, I actually squared the denonimators whle forgetting to square the numerators, lol), but I was able to guess the right answer using this reasoning:

The answer can be no more than \frac{7}{2} \hbar \omega, so eliminate A, and (from the magnitudes of the coefficients) has to be greater than \frac{5}{2} \hbar \omega, so rule out C. D and E might be ruled out by those constraints, but more importantly, in a calculation like this there's no way you're going to get square roots in the denominator, you know the coefficients get squared.

So yes, requires some knowledge of quantum, but it works if you screw up the math ;)
Alternate Solution - Unverified
Comments
ramparts
2009-10-07 14:30:21
I made a stupid mistake as well (albeit not the same one as kev and f4hy, I actually squared the denonimators whle forgetting to square the numerators, lol), but I was able to guess the right answer using this reasoning:

The answer can be no more than \frac{7}{2} \hbar \omega, so eliminate A, and (from the magnitudes of the coefficients) has to be greater than \frac{5}{2} \hbar \omega, so rule out C. D and E might be ruled out by those constraints, but more importantly, in a calculation like this there's no way you're going to get square roots in the denominator, you know the coefficients get squared.

So yes, requires some knowledge of quantum, but it works if you screw up the math ;)
Alternate Solution - Unverified
kevglynn
2006-11-03 08:31:16
Don't be stupid like I was when I took this test. I quickly did the calculation as you see above, then doing a little scan of the problem to make sure I hadn't missed anything, I saw the negative sign on-\frac{2}{sqrt{14}} |2\rangle and decided to subtract that portion instead, thus switching from the correct answer to the incorrect answer.
f4hy
2009-04-02 16:37:12
I made the same mistake.
Common Pitfalls

Post A Comment!
You are replying to:
Don't be stupid like I was when I took this test. I quickly did the calculation as you see above, then doing a little scan of the problem to make sure I hadn't missed anything, I saw the negative sign on-\frac{2}{sqrt{14}} |2\rangle and decided to subtract that portion instead, thus switching from the correct answer to the incorrect answer.

Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...