GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR9677 #85
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
This problem is still being typed.
Mechanics}Wave Phenomena


One can solve this problem without knowing anything about mechanics (but with just the barest idea of wave phenomenon theory). Following the hint, one considers the limiting cases:

M\rightarrow \infty \Rightarrow \mu/M \rightarrow 0... With an infinite M, the string is basically fixed on the rod, and its wavelength is just \lambda=L. One eliminates choice (A) from the fact that \cos 2\pi = 1 \neq 0, as \mu/M demands in this regime.

M\rightarrow 0 \Rightarrow \mu/M \rightarrow \infty... Without the presence of the mass M, one has \lambda = 4L. Thus, 2\pi L/\lambda=\pi/2. Since \tan x = \sin x/\cos x and \cos \pi/2 = 0, one finds that choice (B) is the only one that fits this condition.

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
Herminso
2009-09-21 12:54:05
Consider the motion of the end attached to the ring of mass M:

-T\sin {\theta}=M\ddot{y},

where T is the tension of the right end of the string applied directly on M making a small \theta angle with the horizontal, such that

\sin {\theta}\simeq\sin {\theta}=\frac{\triangle y}{\triangle x}=\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}.

By other hand we know that the string is making a harmonic oscilation of the form y=A\sin {kx}+B\cos {kx}, where B=0 since the left end of the string is fixed, y(x=0)=0. Thus,

\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}=Ak\cos {kx} and \ddot{y}=-Ak^2\dot{x}^2\sin {kx}+A\ddot{x}k \cos {kx},

with \ddot{x}=0 since the wave on the string go at constant velocity given by v^2=\dot{x}^2=T/\mu.

Substituting above,

-T(Ak\cos {kx})=M(-Ak^2\frac{T}{\mu}\sin {kx}) \Rightarrow \mu/M=k\tan {kx},

but M is restricted to move only at x=L, thus \mu/M=k\tan {kL}.
Alternate Solution - Unverified
Comments
Yaroslav_Sh
2017-06-28 10:27:48
Can someone explain me please why do we treat \\mu and M as independent parameters?\r\n I would think that if we keep L fixed and increase M by factor of two that would essentially make \\mu twice larger as well. Yet if it is indeed the case then consideration of large and small limits of M won\'t change \\frac{\\mu}{M} at all.
Yaroslav_Sh
2017-06-28 10:32:20
Sorry, didn\'t notice that M is mass of the ring, not the string.
NEC
mpdude8
2012-04-20 18:30:42
If ETS gives you a hint, use the damn hint.

Eliminate everything except A and B -- those are the only options that can blow up as M --> 0.
NEC
faith
2010-11-02 00:52:08
by mathematics, (trigonometry for that matter) and taking ETS hints. the only trigonometry ratio that allows infinity is the tan Teta.

only A and B left.

for M=0, becomes tanTeta= infinity: teta are n pi/2 with n odd integer.
say n=1, 2pi L/lamda=pi/2
L=lamda/4 . sketch this wave length which reveal an unclosed wave (antinode at the end). this implies freedom of movement. hence B is the answer.
Dr. D.R. Dopetec
2011-09-25 12:07:49
What about cot(theta)?
checkyoself
2011-10-12 13:06:22
cot() blows up when it's argument is integer multiples of pi (incl. zero). In the case where M approaches infinity where we know lambda approaches L, the cot() function doesn't work because it will yield infinity when we want zero.

I don't know about the other limit - you have funny values of lambda which I don't understand (help?). Anyway using just the one limit is enough to identify the answer.
NEC
Herminso
2009-09-21 12:54:05
Consider the motion of the end attached to the ring of mass M:

-T\sin {\theta}=M\ddot{y},

where T is the tension of the right end of the string applied directly on M making a small \theta angle with the horizontal, such that

\sin {\theta}\simeq\sin {\theta}=\frac{\triangle y}{\triangle x}=\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}.

By other hand we know that the string is making a harmonic oscilation of the form y=A\sin {kx}+B\cos {kx}, where B=0 since the left end of the string is fixed, y(x=0)=0. Thus,

\frac{\partial y}{\partial x}=Ak\cos {kx} and \ddot{y}=-Ak^2\dot{x}^2\sin {kx}+A\ddot{x}k \cos {kx},

with \ddot{x}=0 since the wave on the string go at constant velocity given by v^2=\dot{x}^2=T/\mu.

Substituting above,

-T(Ak\cos {kx})=M(-Ak^2\frac{T}{\mu}\sin {kx}) \Rightarrow \mu/M=k\tan {kx},

but M is restricted to move only at x=L, thus \mu/M=k\tan {kL}.
walczyk
2011-03-30 17:22:11
this is awesome. now if there is anyone smart enough to do normal mode oscillation examples, then that would be perfect.
hjq1990
2012-10-14 01:33:52
Yes, why is ETS bothering contriving 100 questions instead of 10 that require our comprehensive abilities? Is that because in modern time computation is less important than knowing as wide as possible?
Alternate Solution - Unverified
socks
2008-09-17 10:06:09
No explicit knowledge of the modes in the M\rightarrow 0 limit is necessary.

From the M\rightarrow\infty limit we see that there must be modes for \lambda=2L/n where n is a positive integer. This narrows the choices down to B, C, or D. Choice D is ruled out immediately as we suspect there must be a dependence on the mass of the ring.

In the M\rightarrow 0 limit, we see that C allows for no modes since the LHS goes to infinity and the RHS is bounded (except for \lambda\rightarrow 0). The only physical intuition required to obtain choice B is that there must still exist standing modes even for a massless ring.
NEC
FortranMan
2008-09-03 17:07:15
for me, the first key was to realize that rapid movement of the string (short wavelength) would require a light ring mass, hence M \propto \lambda. Then remember tan \theta = \frac{x}{y} and \frac{\lambda \mu}{2 \pi M} corresponds to components of the wave.NEC
panos85
2007-10-23 01:32:08
There is a (minor) inaccuracy in this solution. As M goes to \infty we have nodes on both sides so every wavelength of the form \lambda=\frac{2L}{k} with k=1,2,... is acceptable. (Remember the standing waves.) In a similar way, when M=0, every wavelength of the form: \lambda=\frac{4L}{2k+1} with k=0,1,2,... is acceptable. The answer B is the only one that is satisfied when you plug in these values.
QuantumCat
2014-09-23 14:39:10
Thanks for clearing this up. I was really confused by the \lambda = 4L appearance, but this makes perfect sense when I think about it. The analogy I made is that in an open-ended pipe, you get quarter wavelengths, and this situation appears to be the same.
NEC
dumbguy
2007-10-18 21:52:06
can we still get a better explanation why when M goes to zero lambda=L/4
nontradish
2012-04-19 19:57:40
I am sure this will not help dumbguy, but maybe it will help someone else. When M -> 0 picture it as a quarter of a wave. There is one node on the wall and the first antinode on the rod.
NEC
Mexicana
2007-10-05 14:36:55
I think there's a mistake in the relation for the fundamental harmonic that you are quoting. Instead this should be L=\lambda/4 for M\rightarrow 0 (open end) and L=\lambda/2 for M\rightarrow \infty (closed end). In this way the limiting conditions are both satisfied by choice (B)
Lego
2009-01-17 11:50:03
Excellent! This is what i had in mind too!
NEC
cyberdeathreaper
2007-02-04 19:53:47
Also, can someone explain why the wavelength is 4L when M approaches zero?
hamood
2007-04-11 21:36:40
when m approaches zero
node on the left and antinode on the right
L = lambda/4
wavelength = 4L
Answered Question!
cyberdeathreaper
2007-02-04 19:43:37
It's unclear to me why the wavelengths of the standing waves have to be of any specified value. For example, when M approaches infinity, the wavelength could be 2L, L, 2L/3, etc...
hamood
2007-04-11 21:39:14
when m is very large you have nodes on both ends

Answered Question!
chri5tina
2006-11-28 06:23:44
answer A) has a cotangent in it, not a cosine.Typo Alert!
buddy.epson
2006-10-14 14:18:57
With M>>mu, lambda=2L, as the antinode is in the center at L/2. That gives the term tan(pi)=0, what you want for the limiting case in (b). Typo Alert!
alpha
2005-11-07 01:51:52
Good idea.NEC

Post A Comment!
You are replying to:
Also, can someone explain why the wavelength is 4L when M approaches zero?

Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...