GR9677 #40
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
BerkeleyEric 2010-09-22 22:36:21 | I think process of elimination is fastest here. From the Bohr formula we know that the n=1 is at 4*(-13.6 eV) ~ -52 eV. So it can't be (D). And it also can't be (B) since the n=2 state wouldn't be all the way up at -6 eV.
Now remember that 470 nm falls in the visible regime, so the energy difference must be at around 1-2 eV. This immediately eliminates (C) and (E) since they must be more than this amount lower than the n=4 state. | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ee78/3ee78fd1945fad387f0a3e79e13799dbd707508f" alt="Alternate Solution - Unverified" | archard 2010-07-15 13:50:25 | You can also get it with the Rydberg formula, since you're given the wavelength of the photon and the initial energy level. Then it's just plug and chug. | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ee78/3ee78fd1945fad387f0a3e79e13799dbd707508f" alt="Alternate Solution - Unverified" |
|
Comments |
cczako 2013-10-18 15:21:38 | The way I did was to just remember that E is proportional to Z^2/n^2. Its quick and easy to calculate that n=4 --> E=- 3 eV, n=3 --> E=-6 eV, n=2 --> E=-13.6 eV, and n=1 --> E=-50 eV. This automatically eliminates B and D. Then using the equation E=(hc)/lambda (I always use 1240 nm*eV for hc) you get that 470 nm is about 3 eV. So n=4 of energy -3 eV minus 3 eV gives you -6 eV. This gives you choice A. | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/893d1/893d18b4ba032a1752da9732037d2c851971d949" alt="NEC" | BerkeleyEric 2010-09-22 22:36:21 | I think process of elimination is fastest here. From the Bohr formula we know that the n=1 is at 4*(-13.6 eV) ~ -52 eV. So it can't be (D). And it also can't be (B) since the n=2 state wouldn't be all the way up at -6 eV.
Now remember that 470 nm falls in the visible regime, so the energy difference must be at around 1-2 eV. This immediately eliminates (C) and (E) since they must be more than this amount lower than the n=4 state. | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ee78/3ee78fd1945fad387f0a3e79e13799dbd707508f" alt="Alternate Solution - Unverified" | archard 2010-07-15 13:50:25 | You can also get it with the Rydberg formula, since you're given the wavelength of the photon and the initial energy level. Then it's just plug and chug.
sina2 2013-09-24 02:17:02 |
I tried in this way, but I failed.
|
nasim 2015-10-12 17:05:01 |
One should first have the Rydberg constant to be able to use Rydberg formula! But doesn\'t!
|
| data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ee78/3ee78fd1945fad387f0a3e79e13799dbd707508f" alt="Alternate Solution - Unverified" | asdfman 2009-11-05 00:37:16 | You can quickly narrow this down as anything less than ~400 nm is UV. If you remember that 13.6 eV, from hydrogen yields UV then that tosses out choices C, D, and E. | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/893d1/893d18b4ba032a1752da9732037d2c851971d949" alt="NEC" | f4hy 2009-10-25 19:28:33 | I am confused. When finding are you using the speed of light in cm but the wave length in meters?
kroner 2009-10-29 14:13:19 |
Everything is in meters there.
eV m or 1240 eV nm,
which good value to know off-hand for problems like this.
|
| data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/893d1/893d18b4ba032a1752da9732037d2c851971d949" alt="NEC" | astro_allison 2005-12-08 22:50:07 | don't you mean ? | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/893d1/893d18b4ba032a1752da9732037d2c851971d949" alt="NEC" |
|
Post A Comment! |
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
type this... |
to get... |
$\int_0^\infty$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e421b/e421b2768fde1eea30f88b5d0350c204e3b9d7a7" alt="" |
$\partial$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e03e4/e03e4e81090392c5fb66cfeb87e57c94d2d3118f" alt="" |
$\Rightarrow$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b9d6a/b9d6a7d8935752c89e634f97a39dcb3a13e319fd" alt="" |
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/517d6/517d69854231dd3ba6b5e4ca0bf557341edad32a" alt="" |
$\sqrt{z}$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f89e/9f89e94089255ec7a7e6a7cc316642a16e5153b9" alt="" |
$\langle my \rangle$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/751ee/751eeae49131cbfbb01c7cef2d5932847f6aa9ff" alt="" |
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/872ca/872cab847b907934eef431b8a4055c546d2d3ace" alt=""_{me}) |
$\vec{E}$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eedda/eeddac9c0923f6a85323512e401b96d0d51253f4" alt="" |
$\frac{a}{b}$ |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f2ab/7f2ab614e2b9bc361dd6f47629e77c4d4225f566" alt="" |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|