GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR9277 #11
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
\prob{11}
9277_11

The capacitor in the circuit shown above is initially charged. After closing the switch, how much time elapses until one-half of the capacitor's initial stored energy is dissipated?


  1. RC
  2. RC/2
  3. RC/4
  4. 2RCln(2)
  5. RCln(2)/2

Electromagnetism}RC Circuit

The energy of a capacitor C with voltage V across it is given by U=\frac{1}{2}CV^2=\frac{Q^2}{2C}. (Q=CV derives the other variations of the energy.)

From Ohm's Law, one arrives at the relation between charge and time, Q/C+\dot{Q}R=0 \Rightarrow \frac{Q}{RC}=-\frac{dQ}{dt} \Rightarrow -\frac{dt}{RC}=\frac{dQ}{Q}. Integrating both sides, one finds that Q(t)=Q_0 e^{-t/(RC)}.

Plugging this into the energy equation above, one has U \propto Q(t)^2 \propto e^{-2t/(RC)}. Twice time required for the energy to dissipate by 2 is thus given by 1/2 = e^{-t/(RC)} \Rightarrow t_{1/2}=RCln(2. Divide it by 2 to get choice (E).

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
niux
2009-11-06 07:02:08
My way was:
As Q is proportional to \sqrt{U}, then you will need a factor of (\frac{1}{sqrt2}) for Q (that is, a factor of 2^{-\frac{1}{2}}) in order to obtain \frac{U}{2} as the problem requires. Then just equate this to time dependece for discharge:
\2^{-1/2}=\e^{-t/RC}
and solving for t, you will get answer (E)
Alternate Solution - Unverified
QM320
2008-11-08 06:07:58
You can also remember (or derive) I=I_0 e^-{t/(RC)}. So V=V_0 e^-{t/(RC)}. Squaring this, and using U=\frac{1}{2}C V^2, we find U=U_0 e^{-2t/(RC)}. Plug in U=U_0/2 and solve. Voila!Alternate Solution - Unverified
QM320
2008-11-08 06:07:16
You can also remember (or derive) I=I_0 e^-{t/(RC)}.  So V=V_0 e^-{t/(RC)}.  Squaring this, and using U=\frac{1}{2}C V^2, we find U=U_0 e^{-2t/(RC)}.  Plug in U=U_0/2$ and solve. Voila!Alternate Solution - Unverified
Comments
psychonautQQ
2013-10-07 14:07:40
What am I doing wrong..?

Qf = Qie^(t/rc)
U --> Q^2
so Qf^2 = (Qi^2)/(2^2 )--> (Qi^2)/4 = (Qi^2)e^(2t/rc)
1/4 = e^(t/rc)
ln(1/4) = t/rc
rc*ln(1/4) = t.

I realize this is wrong, I feel like the given answer skips some steps, it'd be coo if someone could elaborate.

NEC
kstephe6
2012-11-04 17:30:56
ONLY FAST ANSWERS MATTER!

half life (of charger in this case) is ln(2)*(tau)

this gives the time it takes for (1/2) of the charge to remain, which is the same (by the energy equation) as (1/4) of the energy to remain.

Well, you want twice as much energy left as this, so you only want half of this time to pass. Just the divide the half life by 2.

DONE!
kstephe6
2012-11-05 05:09:16
I meant this as an alternate solution.
NEC
Quark
2011-10-25 13:40:35
What if instead of U=\frac{1}{2}\frac{Q^2}{C} you remembered U=\frac{1}{2}QV. Then you would think that the energy was proportional to Q instead of Q^2 and get the wrong answer...
Dr. D.R. Dopetec
2011-10-31 20:44:52
Realize that the charge is constant in this circuit, but the voltage across the capacitor is not. There is no voltage pump (e.g. battery) in this circuit.
NEC
niux
2009-11-06 07:02:08
My way was:
As Q is proportional to \sqrt{U}, then you will need a factor of (\frac{1}{sqrt2}) for Q (that is, a factor of 2^{-\frac{1}{2}}) in order to obtain \frac{U}{2} as the problem requires. Then just equate this to time dependece for discharge:
\2^{-1/2}=\e^{-t/RC}
and solving for t, you will get answer (E)
Alternate Solution - Unverified
tsharky87
2009-10-30 09:30:42
In the official solution, he uses Ohm's law as
Q/C+\dot{Q}R=0,
but isn't Ohm's law actually
V=IR \Rightarrow Q/C - \dot{Q}R = 0?
kroner
2009-11-01 16:16:31
Yosun is implicitly using Kirchhoff's voltage law here: V_C + V_R = 0.
Then from V_R = IR and V_C = Q/C, we get Q/C + \dot{Q}R = 0.
Answered Question!
QM320
2008-11-08 06:07:58
You can also remember (or derive) I=I_0 e^-{t/(RC)}. So V=V_0 e^-{t/(RC)}. Squaring this, and using U=\frac{1}{2}C V^2, we find U=U_0 e^{-2t/(RC)}. Plug in U=U_0/2 and solve. Voila!
gravity
2010-11-07 23:06:46
If you're like me and get retarded wondering if it should be divide by two or multiplied by two (debating between Answer D or E), remember that the Energy is proportional to the voltage^2 and so the energy will dissipate faster than the voltage, and thus current. The time constant is the time that it takes for the current to half, so we know it should be shorter than this. D is out, E is in.

And that's how you pass the GRE by being too dumb to figure out the U = U_0/2 stuff. (I don't know, it takes me longer to think about that than it does to think about the answer I gave).
Alternate Solution - Unverified
QM320
2008-11-08 06:07:50
You can also remember (or derive) I=I_0 e^-{t/(RC)}. So V=V_0 e^-{t/(RC)}. Squaring this, and using U=\frac{1}{2}C V^2, we find U=U_0 e^{-2t/(RC)}. Plug in U=U_0/2 and solve. Voila!NEC
QM320
2008-11-08 06:07:16
You can also remember (or derive) I=I_0 e^-{t/(RC)}.  So V=V_0 e^-{t/(RC)}.  Squaring this, and using U=\frac{1}{2}C V^2, we find U=U_0 e^{-2t/(RC)}.  Plug in U=U_0/2$ and solve. Voila!
QM320
2008-11-08 06:08:38
Oops -- bad LaTeX. See the version above!
Alternate Solution - Unverified
dcb
2007-09-16 14:18:22
(I'm no expert, so feel free to poke holes in my method).
Mathless solution:

If you can recall these two simple things from your electronics or basic physics class:

1) Time constant for full charge is RC
2) Time relation is logarithmic.

By 1, we can rule out anything greater than RC (eliminate D).
By 2, we can rule out anything without an "ln" (eliminate A, B, C)

That leaves E.

ewhite2
2007-10-27 10:57:35
RC is the time to dissipate 2/3 of the charge in the capacitor, not the full charge. However even after putting this value into your line of reasoning it still works for a quick way to find a solution under the time constraints.
NEC
boundforthefloor
2006-11-19 17:51:50
The problem asks for the time it takes to lose half of the initial stored energy.

I'd rather think of the equation to solve as Q(t)^2 = C*e^(-2t/RC) = 1/2

which will multiply U by 1/2 as shown in the first equation because C is constant.
NEC
agaliarept
2006-11-18 15:26:46
What do you mean by "dissipate by 2"? I am trying to write out the whole equation and something isnt coming out quite right.
StrangeQuark
2007-05-22 12:46:13
Try this,
we are looking for the time in which the energy is half of the intial, i.e.
\frac{U_0}{2}=U[t]
\frac{Q_0^2}{2C}\frac{1}{2}=\frac{Q[t]^2}{2C}
\frac{Q_0^2}{2C}\frac{1}{2}=\frac{(Q_0 e^{(\frac{-t}{RC})})^2}{2C}
Now just solve for t
Q_0^2\frac{1}{2}=Q_0^2 e^{\frac{-2t}{RC}
\frac{1}{2}=e^{\frac{-2t}{RC}
ln[1]-ln[2]==\frac{-2t}{RC}
ln[2]RC==2t
t==\frac{ln[2]RC}{2}
Answered Question!

Post A Comment!
You are replying to:
What do you mean by "dissipate by 2"? I am trying to write out the whole equation and something isnt coming out quite right.

Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...