|  
							GR9677 #68
			 | 
			
							
										
			 | 
		   
		  
			
			
					
		
		| 
		
		
			
			
			
		 | 
		 
		
		
			
			  			
			
				| 
				Alternate Solutions				 | 
			 
			
				
				
				jmason86 2009-10-04 15:04:26 | MOE:  
As Yosun said: PE = mgscos . Eliminate (B) and (C) 
Also as Yosun said: Translational KE = 1/2m . Eliminate (D) 
Only (A) and (E) remain. 
Rotational KE = something... another term. (A) is only the Translational KE and the PE; it lacks a Rotational KE term. Eliminate (A). 
(E) Remains. |   |   
				 
				 | 
			 			
			 
  			
			
				| 
				Comments				 | 
			 
			
				
				
				ngendler 2015-10-23 05:06:16 | Does no one else see a DOT over the m in choice (E)???
											
											
											camcam 2019-09-12 16:14:14 | 
										     It looks like a printing error, there are similar dots all over the page if you look closely. That one\'s just in an unfortunate spot, I guess.
  |  
											 
										  |   |  nc 2014-10-16 15:48:23 | Without actually calculating the Lagrangian, we know that kinetic energy term will depend on omega, so that eliminates A and D. We also know that L = T - U and that U = mgscos(theta). The only choice that makes sense, then, is E.  |   |  Sagan_fan 2013-05-23 15:08:36 | The no-effort MOE:      L = T - U 
 
Here T has two components, rotational and translational, so we want an answer with 3 terms; Eliminate (A) and (D).  
 
Since the potential should be subtracted, eliminate (C).   
 
By inspection, U has an angle term, eliminating (B) |   |  jmason86 2009-10-04 15:04:26 | MOE:  
As Yosun said: PE = mgscos . Eliminate (B) and (C) 
Also as Yosun said: Translational KE = 1/2m . Eliminate (D) 
Only (A) and (E) remain. 
Rotational KE = something... another term. (A) is only the Translational KE and the PE; it lacks a Rotational KE term. Eliminate (A). 
(E) Remains. |   |  f4hy 2009-04-03 18:28:36 | LIMITS! 
I first eliminated C since the wrong sign and then B because no theta dependance. 
 
From there I thought what would happen if  . Well then it should be like a free falling particle so D is out. The spinning must give some kinetic energy so there goes A. E is the only one left. |   |  r10101 2007-10-30 19:13:43 | After eliminating (B) and (C) by the potential term, use variable dependency: T = T  for sure, so (A) and (D) are both out as well.
											
											
											p3ace 2008-04-11 10:25:59 | 
										     This is a great observation, but if there were other choices with   dependence in the middle term, one would have to solve more exactly. 
 I would use the expression for   in spherical coordinates which should be memorized, and in cylindrical coord.'s as well. 
 
  |  
											 
										 
											
											
											p3ace 2008-04-11 10:44:23 | 
										     I hit post prematurely. Sorry.rnAs I was saying, the expressions for velocity in the other coordinates are very handy for problems like this one because one can simply dot r vector with itself to get v^2 for kinetic energy. rnIn this case, The spherical symmetry lends itself perfectly to the problem because s is just r, and   is  '. Also,   is fixed, so  ' is zero. Then dot the velocity with itself and multiply by (1/2)m and Wah-Lah. You have it.rnI would type in the origianl expression for velocity in spherical coordinates but I'm not used to Latex and would rather be studying. I got it from Mechanics by Symon, and I've used it to solve numersous problems with cylindrical or spherical symmetry.
  |  
											 
										  |   |   
				 
				 | 
			 			
			 
			
			
			
		 | 
		 
		 						
			 
			 | 
		   
		 
	 | 
    
	
	
  
    The Sidebar Chatbox... 
	Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... | 
   
  
    | 
		
	 | 
   
 
	
	
	
	
	 |