GR 8677927796770177 | # Login | Register

GR9677 #65
Problem
 GREPhysics.NET Official Solution Alternate Solutions
This problem is still being typed.
Mechanics$\Rightarrow$}Conservation Laws

From conservation of momentum, one has $mv_0=Mv \Rightarrow v_0 = Mv/m$. The man does work on both himself and the boat. Thus, the work-kinetic energy theorem has $W=\Delta K = 1/2 m v_0^2 + 1/2 M v^2 = 1/2( M^2/m +M )v^2, as in choice (D)$

Alternate Solutions
 There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one!
malxmusician212
2018-03-28 16:04:02
you can also eliminate all the other answers by noting that as $m\\rightarrow 0$, the work required should approach infinity in a classical problem like this
exile
2014-10-16 23:37:34
This question bothers me.

The work done is a result of the force applied, and because its really the boat that applied a force to the man, didn't the boat really do the work on the man (meaning the man did no work on himself, only work on the boat)? Or am I missing something?

I thought the test was trying to be tricky, but ironically I suppose in this question it was trying to be obvious.
 ngendler2015-10-23 05:01:55 That\'s what I thought too!
 juxtaroberto2017-07-23 08:01:08 But the boat only applied a force to the man because the man applied the force to the boat. Either way, energy is not a vector like momentum. The kinetic energies of the boat and the man don\'t cancel, the way their final momenta do. So, since the boat and the man started with zero kinetic energy, and both ended up with some kinetic energy, and the only energy source there is the man, he must have done all the work required to move himself forward and to move the boat back.\r\n\r\nThis also makes sense because as he jumps away, he\'s wasting some of his jump into pushing back against the boat, so the boat starts moving backward before his feet leave it, and that\'s some \"wasted\" energy that he expended but won\'t be propelling him forward. Thus the total work he does must be greater than his own kinetic energy.
redmomatt
2011-09-23 14:05:09
Slightly different angle.

Since m $v_{0}$ = M v, we know that $v_{0}$ = Mv / m and $v_{0}$ > v. Therefore, the man must have a larger KE than the boat. We also see that there are two different denominators for $v_{0}$ and v, so any addition of the two (Work-KE) will yield a total with both M and m somewhere.

Thus, looking at the answers, this leaves only (D).
 redmomatt2011-09-23 14:34:24 Just a note... This should be the case for any M > m, so that the KE of m > KE of M (smaller mass => larger velocity for a given force, and since KE is dominated by $v^2$, the KE of the smaller object should be greater here). Thus, if they are represented by different symbols, you would expect to find an equation with M and m, where the KE of m > KE of M. In this case, again, this leaves only (D).
walczyk
2011-03-31 13:07:05
here's a fast way to think this through. don't be scared when you see work, because you'll remember the work-kinetic energy theorem and know that this is what the problem is asking.

So work is equal to the change of kinetic energy, as written in the solution above. so write it out, and THEN apply conservation of momentum to eliminate $v_0$. Doing things in this order just keeps you from getting confused.

Slightly different angle. Since m $v_{0}$ = M v, we know that $v_{0}$ = Mv / m and $v_{0}$ > v. Therefore, the man must have a larger KE than the boat. We also see that there are two different denominators for $v_{0}$ and v, so any addition of the two (Work-KE) will yield a total with both M and m somewhere. Thus, looking at the answers, this leaves only (D).
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex.,$\alpha^2_0$produces $\alpha^2_0$. type this... to get...$\int_0^\infty$$\int_0^\infty$$\partial$$\partial$$\Rightarrow$$\Rightarrow$$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$$\sqrt{z}$$\sqrt{z}$$\langle my \rangle$$\langle my \rangle$$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$$\vec{E}$$\vec{E}$$\frac{a}{b}\$ $\frac{a}{b}$