|
GR9677 #6 |
|
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
99percent 2008-11-06 06:25:06 | An easy way...
Since, the speed of the block is constant, there is no gain in the kinetic energy of the block.
Thus, potential energy lost by the block = Energy dissipated by friction = mgh.
Bingo..!!
|  |
|
|
Comments |
99percent 2008-11-06 06:25:06 | An easy way...
Since, the speed of the block is constant, there is no gain in the kinetic energy of the block.
Thus, potential energy lost by the block = Energy dissipated by friction = mgh.
Bingo..!!
|  | cyberdeathreaper 2006-12-28 19:42:46 | Isn't it somewhat repetitive to solve for the coefficient of kinetic friction, to plug back in to solve for friction, to calculate work? Couldn't you solve for f from your x-coordinate forces (f=mgsin(theta)), and plug that straight into your work equation (W=fl)? |  | daschaich 2005-11-07 23:22:21 | There's an easier way to do it - conservation of energy. Since the speed of the block is constant, its kinetic energy is the same at the top and bottom of the ramp. Therefore all its gravitational potential energy (mgh) must have been dissipated by friction.
Blake7 2007-09-22 08:04:31 |
Excellent observation; saves a tremendous amount of time with much less risk.
|
dcan 2008-04-09 17:11:02 |
This seems so obvious after seeing the answer. It's hard to get out of the crunch mode.
|
tau1777 2008-11-05 14:49:47 |
all i could say after reading this was:quite beautiful. this is an excellent solution, thank you for sharing.
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|
|