GREPhysics.NET: GR9277 #9

GR9277 #9

Problem

GREPhysics.NET Official Solution

\prob{9}

A coaxial cable having radii a, b, and c carries equal and opposite currents of magnitude i on the inner and outer conductors. What is the magnitude of the magnetic induction at point P outside of the cable at a distance r from the axis?

Zero
$\frac{\mu_0 i r}{2\pi a^2}$
$\frac{\mu_0 i}{2\pi r}$
$\frac{\mu_0 i}{2\pi r}\frac{c^2-r^2}{c^2-b^2}$
$\frac{\mu_0 i}{2\pi r}\frac{r^2-b^2}{c^2-b^2}$

Electromagnetism $\Rightarrow$ }Current Directions

The opposite currents cancel each other, and thus the induction (and field) outside is 0.

Alternate Solutions

There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one!

Comments

pam d
2011-09-27 22:38:58

After having seen these practice tests a few times, I can tell anyone that reads this comment that coaxial cables are definitely something to know.

Reply to this comment

none
2008-10-18 14:02:10

Or more theoretically, the system has axial symmetry, so on a circle centered around the cable, $\vec{B} = constant$ . $\oint_C \vec{B} d\vec{l} = \mu_0 i$ . Enclosed $i$ is zero, so $\vec{B}$ must be zero.

Reply to this comment

Poop Loops
2008-10-05 13:07:57

If you don't remember what coaxial cables are for (shielding a current), then you can do it the following way:

The field has to go to Zero at r -> inf (nothing else makes sense), which only leaves choices A (since it's always Zero), and C.

From here you have a good shot at guessing, but if you remember that C is the field for an unshielded wire (Ampere's Law) http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/phy122/Lecture_Notes/Chapter31/chapter31.html

So A is the only choice left.

ramparts
2009-08-09 16:44:15

The other good way to eliminate C is that it's independent of a and b. The only reason to even suspect this answer is non-zero is because a and b are in different places (and presumably because there's more b surface area than a surface area), so it's ridiculous to have an answer that doesn't involve these two quantities.

Reply to this comment

kevglynn
2006-10-14 10:10:11

If you're like me, you've been through an entire undergraduate physics degree without ever hearing the Magnetic Field referred to as the "magnetic induction." I thought they were talking about electromagnetic induction or something else of which I hadn't heard.

Magnetic Induction is sometimes used for Magnetic field so as not to mix up H and B. I always learned that H was the Auxilliary Field, and B, the Magnetic Field, so be careful if you're like me, and don't slip because of mere semantics.

Furious
2007-10-27 19:08:16

Yeah man, I was in the same boat. I was sitting there going like, "Magnetic Induction, what does that have to do with this system." But in the end I remembered that the entire point of coax cables is to keep the E&M inside the wire, so I got this one right.

Jeremy
2007-10-29 13:43:31

I too was ignorant of the term, and yet, at some time, I must have read what Griffiths has on page 271: "Many authors call $\vec{H}$ , not $\vec{B}$ , the 'magnetic field.' Then they have to invent a new word for $\vec{B}$ : the 'flux density,' or magnetic 'induction' (an absurd choice, since that term already has at least two other meanings in electrodynamics)." Oh well.

Reply to this comment

Post A Comment!

You are replying to:

If you're like me, you've been through an entire undergraduate physics degree without ever hearing the Magnetic Field referred to as the "magnetic induction." I thought they were talking about electromagnetic induction or something else of which I hadn't heard.
Magnetic Induction is sometimes used for Magnetic field so as not to mix up H and B. I always learned that H was the Auxilliary Field, and B, the Magnetic Field, so be careful if you're like me, and don't slip because of mere semantics.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces $\alpha^2_0$ .
type this...	to get...
$\int_0^\infty$	$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$	$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$	$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$	$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$	$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$	$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$	$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$	$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$	$\frac{a}{b}$

The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...

All-Solutions List | Latest Comments | Unanswered Questions (Cries for Help!) |::| About

This site is not affiliated with ETS, nor is it officially endorsed (yet) by ETS. This site is the work of an individual named Yosun Chang. The solutions, sans user comments and ETS questions, are © 2005 by Yosun Chang except where noted. All rights reserved. / The comments appending particular solutions are due to the respective users. / Educational Testing Service, ETS, the ETS logo, Graduate Record Examinations, and GRE are registered trademarks of Educational Testing Service. The examination questions are © 1997 and © 2001 by ETS.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone