GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR9277 #72
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
\prob{72}
A system in thermal equilibrium at temperature T consists of a large number $N_0$ of subsystems, each of which can exist only in two states of energy $E_1$ and $E_2$, where $E_2-E_1=\epsilon \gt 0$. In the expressions that follow, k is the Boltzmann constant.

The internal energy of the system at any temperature T is given by $E_1N_0+\frac{N_0\epsilon}{1+e^{\epsilon/kT}}$. The heat capacity of the system is given by which of the following expressions?


  1. $N_0k \left(\frac{\epsilon}{kT}\right)^2\frac{e^{\epsilon/kT}}{\left(1+e^{\epsilon/kT}\right)^2}$
  2. $N_0k \left(\frac{\epsilon}{kT}\right)^2\frac{1}{\left(1+e^{\epsilon/kT}\right)^2}$
  3. $N_0k\left(\epsilon/kT\right)^2e^{-\epsilon/kT}$
  4. $N_0k\left(\epsilon/kT\right)^2$
  5. $3N_0k/2$

Statistical Mechanics}Heat Capacity

The heat capacity is just dU/dT, where ETS generously supplies U, the internal energy. Since E_1 and N_0 are constants, the first term is trivial.

The temperature-derivative of the second term is N_0\epsilon^2/(kT^2)e^{\epsilon/kT} /(1+e^{\epsilon/kT})^2=, as in choice (A).

(The temperature derivative is easily done if one applies the chain-rule \frac{df}{dy}\frac{dy}{du}\frac{du}{dT} where f=1/y, y=1+e^u, u=\epsilon/(kT).)

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one!
Comments
RebeccaJK42
2007-03-23 10:27:19
Where does the k in the numerator come from?
alpha
2007-03-30 22:37:37
k is Boltzmann constant.. The k on the numerator is actually canceled out by the k^2 in the denominator
Richard
2007-09-14 00:05:03
The fact of the matter is, you have a factor of
\epsilon/k introduced by the derivative.
To make it look pretty, they multiplied the top and bottom by k giving (with the extra \epsilon) the factor k(\frac{\epsilon}{k})^2. Then of course, you have the T^2.
Answered Question!
Andresito
2006-03-29 10:05:29
I could not obtain T^2 in the denominator. Is there an error in the solution provided by the ETS?
radicaltyro
2006-10-31 14:19:25
Hi Andresito,

Review your calculus and try again. The answer is correct.
Blue Quark
2007-11-01 08:00:11
Andresito you made the same mistake I did. The T is in the denominator, not the numerator. Thus when you differentiate you get a (-T^(-2)) in front of the exponential in addition to the normal e/k
Answered Question!

Post A Comment!
You are replying to:
Where does the k in the numerator come from?

Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...
Chat Archives | Delete left banner ad | Donate
(Click to view chat.)

Anonymous:

Hate being Anonymous? Login or Register

EssayEdge.com Admissions Essay Help Poser 7 - Complete 3D Figure Design

Upgrade to Poser 7 Now

Huge Textbook Selection, Low Prices – Phat Campus.

Google