GR9277 #12
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
Herminso 2009-09-22 19:26:52 | We have to solve the Laplace's equation in the region between the conducting plates , but since the potential difference between them is independenet of the cylindrical coordinates and , we have then , so . Now by BC's and . Thus | | mikewofsey 2006-02-10 14:55:32 | An alternative way of looking at this is that as alpha gets large, the potential goes to zero, so alpha needs to be on the bottom or the solution will blow up. Likewise, this requires that phi be on top to make sense. Of the remaining solution, chose B, because of the 1/r relationship of potential. | |
|
Comments |
istezamer 2009-11-06 07:07:59 | Actually I think it is much easier to eliminate choices... If phi equals to zero the potential must be Zero.. This Keeps choices (B) and (D)..
But if Phi equals alpha, the Potential must be Vo.. So only (B) works Out !!! :D
alemsalem 2010-09-27 03:06:10 |
yup just apply the boundary conditions, and you're there
|
| | Herminso 2009-09-22 19:26:52 | We have to solve the Laplace's equation in the region between the conducting plates , but since the potential difference between them is independenet of the cylindrical coordinates and , we have then , so . Now by BC's and . Thus
mvgnzls 2011-09-15 12:49:39 |
I dont see where you get V=A*(phi) + B
where did you get this from?
|
mvgnzls 2011-09-15 12:50:35 |
where did you get V= Aphi+B from?
|
elxcats 2011-10-31 12:01:13 |
@mvgnzls
A(psi) + B is just the solution to the differential equation. Plug it in to the equation to see.
|
RusFortunat 2015-10-22 11:01:48 |
The best solution to this problem. Short and elegant.
|
| | bkardon 2007-09-23 13:21:19 | Another way to approach this problem is as follows:
First narrow down the choices to those that have go from to in the space between the plates (that leaves B and D).
Since there are no charges in the region between the plates, the potential must solve Poisson's equation,
Even if you don't know what is in cylindrical coordinates, you can be confident that it includes a second derivative of \phi. Therefore, if the result of the second derivative in is to be zero, there can't be any terms in the potential. | | pballjew 2006-11-26 17:49:54 | The way I found this is to note that the answer has to be zero when phi equals zero and V when phi = alpha. Then, by uniqueness, since boundary conditions are fit, you're done.
The only answer that fulfills this criteria is (B)
nyuko 2009-10-30 09:43:08 |
yes! this was what I did too! I think it is the easiest approach for this question.
|
| | mikewofsey 2006-02-10 14:55:32 | An alternative way of looking at this is that as alpha gets large, the potential goes to zero, so alpha needs to be on the bottom or the solution will blow up. Likewise, this requires that phi be on top to make sense. Of the remaining solution, chose B, because of the 1/r relationship of potential.
hungrychemist 2007-09-19 20:27:20 |
1/r relationship of potential is not always true. Expecially when infinite (very large) charge distribution is involved.
B or D? B is correct since it's got correct units.
|
Poop Loops 2008-10-05 13:15:53 |
Also, if you only narrow it down between B, D, and A, you can see that the units only make sense for B.
|
sid 2008-10-31 04:16:37 |
dimensional analysis doesn't work in this question as all options have same unit of potential... angle in radians is already unit-less..
angle is just a number....
|
neon37 2010-11-10 10:51:39 |
Can anyone think of anytime when dimensional analysis doesnt work for angle coordinates? I cant think of any. So as heres my hypothesis. Dimensional analysis works when you have angle coordinates eventhough angles technically lack units.
|
livieratos 2011-11-08 10:55:00 |
actually i would say it's easier to think of phi since V=0 when phi=0 and only choice (B) gives that result (at least from the ones that make sense...)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|