|
GR8677 #29
|
|
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
| There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one! |
|
|
Comments |
shafatmubin 2009-10-31 18:12:46 | Fleming's left-hand rule (thuMb for motion, First for field, seCond for current) is used to find direction of motion (i.e. force applied) when current and field directions are known.
So the LHR will work here, if one takes into account of the direction of the CURRENT produced by negative charges (i.e. opposite to velocity direction). |  | dean 2008-10-09 21:45:23 | I may be mistaken, but it seems to me the LHR yields the wrong answer here if used consistently (i.e. twice). Better to stick with the right hand (sorry southpaws) and remember sign.
neon37 2008-11-02 15:41:09 |
not really you are probably trying to figure out the direction of the magnetic field also with LHR. The direction of the field is always with the RHR. You could find the direction the test charge should go given the direction of the field and current, with LHR. I would also suggest sticking to RHR on the real exam. Might be confusing.
|
|  | darox 2006-11-29 06:59:15 | actually, it cannot be B. the direction of the particle would be not parallel, but anti-parallel.
zaharakis 2007-01-05 09:31:42 |
Anti Parallel is still parallel
|
madfish 2007-11-02 12:11:27 |
not when you're talking about relative to a current
|
FortranMan 2008-10-19 13:14:30 |
I thought anti-parallel is still parallel too, until I looked at options (A) and (B).
This problem is deceptively simple, people. Remember that if the charge is moving towards the wire its velocity vector would be negative, but this negative can be canceled out if you are using a negative test charge, resulting in the positive force direction parallel to the positive current direction. In short, the sign of the charge can affect the vector.
|
|  | zaharakis 2006-11-02 14:25:53 | The answer could also be B. The question states parallel to the direction of the current. B would produce a force in the opposite direction to the current but this is still parallel.
zaharakis 2007-01-05 09:31:14 |
Anti parallel is still parallel.
|
tau1777 2008-10-31 19:30:03 |
yeah, i did not realize this the first time i took the test. and as i was redoing it today it hit me, this confusing thing about parallel. i feel that they should be more direct but i guess that's just the ETS. i'll have to keep an eye on my common sense of things and try to see it their way, least until test day. bottom line: to the ETS antiparallel and parallel are different.
|
gt2009 2009-06-22 06:04:21 |
Anti-parallel and parallel are different.
|
|  |
|
|
|
|
|