GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR8677 #26
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
Verbatim question for GR8677 #26
Atomic}X-Rays


The K-series refers to the inner-most shell. (The order from inner to outer goes like K, L, M, N.) K-series refers to a transition from some outer state to the inner-most shell, where n=1 in the usual Bohr equation,

where (Z-1)^2 is used to account for shielding.

For electrons bombarding a target, one assumes that the electrons are coming from n_i=\infty, thus the equation becomes E=-13.6(Z-1)^2\approx 10*900\approx 10,000 eV, as in choice (D).

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
barefoot0
2006-11-14 11:17:02
I dont know if this exactly correct but I did the following.

I know 2.5eV gives ~ 500nm (This is just an easy thing to remember and quite usefull).

X rays are about .1 nm and E is inversly proportional to Lambda so

2.5eV*500nm/.1nm ~ 10,000 eV

Someone let me know if and why this method is wrong.
Alternate Solution - Unverified
Comments
a19grey2
2008-11-03 20:29:42
Uh, am I the only person who calculates the value using 27^2 and n_i = 2, n_f = 1 and gets only ~7,400.

doing this on a test , I'd still guess the right answer, but this seems to far off for this to be the right answer since I got 7435.8eV using a calculator and on the test the approximations would make me even more off.
NEC
FortranMan
2008-10-19 11:03:03
Shouldn't it be

\left( \frac{1}{n^{2}_{i}} - \frac{1}{n^{2}_{f}} \right)

Where n_{i} is the initial state (either at n_{i}=2 or \infty) and n_{f} is the final state (n_{f}=1)? This would explain how the negative cancels out.
NEC
casaubon
2008-10-11 16:41:30
EDX (Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy) is a technique to characterize materials based on the wavelength of x-rays emitted from the sample when excited with an electron beam. Beam energy typically needs to be on the order of 10-25 keV to produce a good signal. So, choice D.NEC
eshaghoulian
2007-09-15 14:54:25
Agreed. The solution above is confusing the state of the bombarding electrons with the initial state of the electron making the transition. For minimum energy necessary, the equation is E = (13.6eV)*((Z-1)^2)((1/1^2)-(1/n_{i}^2)). Minimizing this requires setting n_{i} (the initial state of the transitioning electron) equal to 2 (note that you can't set it equal to 1 since then you wouldn't have a transition). This minimizes the energy necessary for the transition, and you equate this to the KE of the incoming electron, which isn't making any transitions. So the physical process is: electron comes in from \infty, scatters off of an atom by giving up some of its KE, and then the atom makes a transition.

Note the general formula: E = (13.6eV)*((Z-b)^2)((1/n_{f}^2)-(1/n_{i}^2)). This is a slight modification of Bohr's Law, where b and n_{f} depend on the series you are considering (e.g. n_{f}=1 DEFINES K series and gives b=1, n_{f}=2 DEFINES L series and gives b=7.4, etc.). The constants b should probably be memorized, but I don't predict them asking beyond K or L series (probably won't even ask L series).
Typo Alert!
Furious
2007-08-30 18:30:19
I have to agree with kevglynn, the minimum energy comes at n_i =2 not at n_i goes to infinity. That's actually the MAXIMUM energy.NEC
barefoot0
2006-11-14 11:17:02
I dont know if this exactly correct but I did the following.

I know 2.5eV gives ~ 500nm (This is just an easy thing to remember and quite usefull).

X rays are about .1 nm and E is inversly proportional to Lambda so

2.5eV*500nm/.1nm ~ 10,000 eV

Someone let me know if and why this method is wrong.
sonnb
2007-05-29 12:49:53
The spectrum of X rays ranges from 0.1nm to 10nm so that if you had used 1.0nm instead, you would have gotten the wrong answer.
Alternate Solution - Unverified
kevglynn
2006-10-31 11:14:47
I'm pretty sure that the MINIMUM required energy refers to when the electrons come in from n_i=2. In other words, doesn't n_i refer to the initial state of the electron, not the bombarding electrons? thanksTypo Alert!
Healeyx76
2006-10-19 18:44:49
Is there a way to figure out R in Ev if you haven't memorized -13.6eV ? It is not one of the given values at the start of this test.

Oh: I guess you could memorize/know R = (m_e*e^4)/(2*hbar^2) eh?

13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 ..... have to remember that one.
herrphysik
2006-10-27 21:56:12
Definately memorize that number.
NEC

Post A Comment!
You are replying to:
I have to agree with kevglynn, the minimum energy comes at n_i =2 not at n_i goes to infinity. That's actually the MAXIMUM energy.

Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...
Chat Archives | Delete left banner ad | Donate
(Click to view chat.)

Anonymous:

Hate being Anonymous? Login or Register

EssayEdge.com Admissions Essay Help Poser 7 - Complete 3D Figure Design

Upgrade to Poser 7 Now

Huge Textbook Selection, Low Prices – Phat Campus.

Google