GR0177 #99


Problem


This problem is still being typed. 
Special Relativity}Conservation of Energy
The tricky part of this problem is to note that the momentum of the photon is shared equally between all three final particles. (This insight was supplied by Felipe Birk). Thus, , where p is the momentum of the photon and is the momentum of the final electron or photon.
The initial energy before the photon strikes the electron is , which is just the energy of the photon plus the rest energy of the electron.
The final energy after the collision is , which is the sum total energy of all three final particles, i.e., the positron and two electrons. (A positron is the electron's antiparticle, and thus they have the same mass.) Note that the momentum split relation mentioned above is used to equate the final particle momentum with the initial photon momentum.
Conjure up the good conservation of energy idea. Equating , one gets . Canceling the terms on both side, then solving, one arrives at , which is choice (D). 

Alternate Solutions 
opalqnka 20141015 01:29:53  You all post nasty solutions.
Here is an easy one:
The 4momentum of the photon in the lab frame and the 4momentum of the stationary electron are:
= and =
After the interaction 3 particles of equal masses and equal energies and momenta are created with the same 4momentum vector of . We do not care about the form of the momentum, you will see why below:
Use conservation of 4momenta:
+ = 3
Now square (using the dot product with [, +, +, +] metric) and use the fact that for a photon P.P = 0 and in the rest frame of the electrons/protons . = . =  , ie we exploit the fact that P.P is invariant!
=>
. + 2. + . = 9.
or
0  2Em  = 9
or E = 4m as in answer (D).
I hope you will find this approach useful. Thank you for hosting the site!   ArslanUyghur 20140925 03:50:08  No four vectors and any frames, you can use just Energy–momentum relation and Energy and momentum conservation law:
(basic equation)
for the photon we have:
(remember its mass is zero)
for the electron before collision
(here p=0)
so the total energy of the system before collision is:
or
Now let's see what is the energy of the system after collision, using Energy–momentum relation we get:
where p is the same momentum of the photon or total linear momentum of three particles(since momentum is conserved).
Equating the two expressions for square of energy, we obtain the following:
=p^2+9m^2$
The solution is:
p=4m
or in SI units:
p=4mc
and energy of the photon is 4mc^2.
The answer is D.   vadim 20121108 12:52:15  Shorter solution using relativistic invariant:
Comparing this value in initial laboratory frame and in final frame of particles one can obtain:
As far as photon is concerned, , which brings us to , or in SI   insertphyspun 20110626 12:13:41  I have not yet seen the simplest solution, although dryu and matonski came close. Yes, you should use four vectors, but recall that the square of the momentum four vector is invariant! So, jump into the CM reference frame when determining the momentum four vector after the collision to make life simpler! To be more explicit, here it goes:
The momentum four vector before the collision, where is the energy of the incoming photon and is the rest energy of the electron, is
(Using should be second nature by now!)
The momentum four vector after the collision, taken in the CM frame of the three particles, is awesomely simple,
The squared four vectors are equal, so put them together and solve for !
  dryu 20081017 22:32:47  It's simplest to use four vectors. In natural units:
The initial fourmomentum is and the final fourmomentum is . The invariant mass, e.g. these four vectors squared, is conserved:
To convert this into SI units, just let .  

Comments 
opalqnka 20141015 01:29:53  You all post nasty solutions.
Here is an easy one:
The 4momentum of the photon in the lab frame and the 4momentum of the stationary electron are:
= and =
After the interaction 3 particles of equal masses and equal energies and momenta are created with the same 4momentum vector of . We do not care about the form of the momentum, you will see why below:
Use conservation of 4momenta:
+ = 3
Now square (using the dot product with [, +, +, +] metric) and use the fact that for a photon P.P = 0 and in the rest frame of the electrons/protons . = . =  , ie we exploit the fact that P.P is invariant!
=>
. + 2. + . = 9.
or
0  2Em  = 9
or E = 4m as in answer (D).
I hope you will find this approach useful. Thank you for hosting the site!   opalqnka 20141015 01:24:54  You all post nasty solutions.
Here is an easy one:
The 4momentum of the photon in the lab frabe and the 4momentum of the stationary electron are:
= and =
After the interaction 3 particles of equal masses and equal energies and momenta are created with the same 4momentum vector of . We do not care about the form of the momentum, you will see why below:
Use conservation of 4momenta:
+ = 3
Now square (using the dot product with [, +, +, +] metric) and use the fact that for a photon P.P = 0 and in the rest frame of the electrons/protons . = . =  , ie we exploit the fact that P.P is invariant!
=>
. + 2. + . = 9.
or
0  2Em  = 9
or E = 4m as in answer (D).
I hope you will find this approach useful. Thank you for hosting the site!
  ArslanUyghur 20140925 03:50:08  No four vectors and any frames, you can use just Energy–momentum relation and Energy and momentum conservation law:
(basic equation)
for the photon we have:
(remember its mass is zero)
for the electron before collision
(here p=0)
so the total energy of the system before collision is:
or
Now let's see what is the energy of the system after collision, using Energy–momentum relation we get:
where p is the same momentum of the photon or total linear momentum of three particles(since momentum is conserved).
Equating the two expressions for square of energy, we obtain the following:
=p^2+9m^2$
The solution is:
p=4m
or in SI units:
p=4mc
and energy of the photon is 4mc^2.
The answer is D.   sayebms 20130901 02:28:08  first of all thank you for such a great website.
in this problem we apply both conservation of momentum and conservation of energy.(since we have two unknowns we must have two equations)
call as which is the individual momentum for each particle.
then
now apply conservation of energy as given in the solution above.   vadim 20121108 12:52:15  Shorter solution using relativistic invariant:
Comparing this value in initial laboratory frame and in final frame of particles one can obtain:
As far as photon is concerned, , which brings us to , or in SI   insertphyspun 20110626 12:13:41  I have not yet seen the simplest solution, although dryu and matonski came close. Yes, you should use four vectors, but recall that the square of the momentum four vector is invariant! So, jump into the CM reference frame when determining the momentum four vector after the collision to make life simpler! To be more explicit, here it goes:
The momentum four vector before the collision, where is the energy of the incoming photon and is the rest energy of the electron, is
(Using should be second nature by now!)
The momentum four vector after the collision, taken in the CM frame of the three particles, is awesomely simple,
The squared four vectors are equal, so put them together and solve for !
4elesta 20120416 06:11:25 
Don't understand why initial energy of photon doesn't change in the rest reference frame?

walczyk 20121105 19:11:32 
It does change, it is not lorentz invariant. Doesn't matter, because only lorentz invariant quantities are independent of reference frame, we are not dealing with energy directly here, only where it turns up in the momentum fourvector elements.

  erica1989 20101108 21:13:20  Sorry about the multipost, was having issues with the browser.   astro8 20100914 21:09:46  The only part i am confused on is not being a square root of the squares.
ie.
Is this form of the total energy only used for multiple kinetic and potential energies being added?
tiptoer 20101026 08:32:07 
I have the same question. Why is instead of ?

aqme28 20101109 18:52:58 
I was confused about this at first too, but I figured it out. Yosun just skipped a few steps algebraically.
since a photon has no mass
since the electron is initially at rest and therefore momentum is 0.
so

  zmburell 20090930 13:05:08  The electron is inititially at rest, so in the expression for the initial 4momentum squared, why isnt (pc)=0,
That is, if the electron is initially at rest then all of its energy is in its rest mass
zmburell 20091003 10:36:56 
Nevermind, Im retarded, I figured it out
disregard my last post

  matonski 20090401 00:35:29  In a reference frame moving along with the three particles at the end, the magnitude of the momentum 4 vector is simply . Since this is an invariant, it must also be the magnitude of the 4 vector at the beginning. Letting be the initial photon energy and setting , we have and . Therefore, its magnitude is Solve for x and you are done.   Poop Loops 20081102 14:41:44  I'm confused... if they don't say how fast the 3 particles are moving, how can we deduce the energy of the photon? It was at least since it created a positron and an electron and then moved them. Okay, that makes sense.
But if the collision sent all going at then the photon would have had more energy than if they were all going at say afterwards. What gives?
flyboy621 20101116 22:12:32 
Conservation of momentum requires the 3 particles to have total momentum equal to the momentum of the photon. We are given that they have equal speeds, so they each have momentum 1/3 that of the photon.

  dryu 20081017 22:32:47  It's simplest to use four vectors. In natural units:
The initial fourmomentum is and the final fourmomentum is . The invariant mass, e.g. these four vectors squared, is conserved:
To convert this into SI units, just let .
cbb6x2 20101104 10:35:19 
E0=Ef where E0 is the total energy before and Ef is the total energy after. The total energy is the energy of each particle summed. Find the energy of each particle separately where (E_particle)^2 = (pc)^2+(mc^2)^2.
E0=E_gamma + E_electron=(pc)^2 +mc^2

erica1989 20101108 21:09:34 
Can you please explain how you got the expression for the four vectors? Thanks!

erica1989 20101108 21:10:32 
Hi
Can you please explain how you got the expression for the four vectors? Thanks!

erica1989 20101108 21:12:07 
Hi can you please explain how you got this expression?

neo55378008 20120320 21:10:51 
It's a shame most books don't teach fourvectors until GR.
Basically, the first component of fourmomentum is the energy (as a particle moves through time it has energy), and the other components are just the x, y, and z components of momentum.
The to fourvectors is the metric. For SR you can use (+) or (+++) as long as you're consistent.
dryu has used the (+) metric, meaning when you take a dot product, the time components keep their sign, and the space components get the opposite sign.

neo55378008 20120320 21:11:43 
*they key to the fourvector is the metric

  ssp 20081017 12:35:10  Why does not common sense work?rnrnYou create pair, that is an energy of rnYou put energy into the resting that gets some energy rnThen you need energy to make the pair move, so you need for the total energy of those particles.rnrnAdding up all energy you need to get something above 3 at least... you are down to 2 answers and 5 seems a bit large for so you pick 4
physick 20110925 10:16:05 
This approach works fine  as you said, the answer must be over , which narrows it down to D and E. Then use the fact that there is an upper limit on the amount of energy the photon could have (such that the speed of the particles doesn't exceed ). This means that if E is possible, then D would have to be possible too! Since the reverse is not true, we may eliminate E to select D as the answer.
This method eliminates option E a bit more logically instead of leaving it to the sense that E "seems a bit large."

  Ning Bao 20080201 08:26:25  If we set c and m=1 and let p=a*m=a The math becomes much simpler.   Tommy Koulax 20071101 22:08:02  I don't understand why p is divided by three. If the photon is no longer, then shouldn't the p be divided by 2?
alpha 20080207 11:02:47 
i think it is because there are 3 final particles?

  TigerTed8 20070913 18:14:56  Although the overall solution seems okay, I think there is a small typo. . Note the second squared on the second term.
sravani 20081009 19:05:48 
TigerTed8 is right. Solution has to be corrected by squaring the second term. Yosun, you got to correct it...

zylstra 20090401 18:35:24 
Please excuse my ignorance. How did you get this formula for ?

  angiep 20051111 22:17:50  im confused, the problem says the photon is destroyed. you say all three share the momtentum, but there are only 2...
angiep 20051111 22:18:29 
nevermind. two electrons, duh

  Void 20051109 23:08:19  Hi Yosun. Great site. I have a few solutions to GR9677 that aren't on your PDF yet. Do you take submissions? How should I send them, if so?
yosun 20051109 23:36:54 
Hi, please post alternate solutions on the website in the comments section corresponding to the particular problem. (The pdf I posted in the yahoo physicsgre group is incomplete and contains a number of errors that I have corrected here on this site. Of course, users like you might have more elegant solutions than what I have postedso, feel free to post away. This site aims to be the most convenient onestop source for all solutions to released ETS GRE Physics exams. You can help by contributing.)

  yosun 20051109 22:08:33  This solution has been corrected.  

Post A Comment! 

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .

type this... 
to get... 
$\int_0^\infty$ 

$\partial$ 

$\Rightarrow$ 

$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ 

$\sqrt{z}$ 

$\langle my \rangle$ 

$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ 

$\vec{E}$ 

$\frac{a}{b}$ 





The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... 

