GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR0177 #6
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
This problem is still being typed.
Thermodynamics}Work

The work done by an adiabatic process is W=-\frac{1}{\gamma - 1}(P_2V_2-P_1V_1). (One can quickly derive this from noting that PV^\gamma = const in an adiabatic process and W=\int P dV.)

The work done by an isothermal process is W=nRT_iln(V_2/V_1)=P_iV_iln(V_2/V_1) (One can quickly derive this from noting that P_2V_2=P_2V_2=nRT_1=nRT_2 for an isothermal process.)

From the above formulae, one can immediately eliminate choice (A).

One can calculate the isothermal work to be W_i = nRT_1 ln 2 = P_1V_1 ln 2.

One can calculate the adiabatic work to be:

W_a = \frac{1}{1-\gamma}(P_1-2P_2)V_1=\frac{1}{1-\gamma}(P_1-2/2^\gamma P_1)V_1 = \frac{1}{1-\gamma}(1-2^{1-\gamma})P_1V_1.

For a monatomic gas, \gamma=5/3, and one finds that 0 <W_a < W_i. Choice (E).

(Also, in general, an adiabatic process always does less work than an isothermal process in a closed cycle.)

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
physgre
2015-10-15 02:19:22
参考卡诺循环图Alternate Solution - Unverified
buaasyh
2014-10-17 02:29:43
In the adiabatic case, the gas lose tempreture because work has been done by the gas. In the isothermal case, the gas maintains tempreture so the presure is higher than the adiabatic case. Therefore, the work done in the isothermal case is more, i.e., $W_i>W_a$.Alternate Solution - Unverified
ProofbyInspection
2010-11-12 09:05:34
You just need to notice that for ideal gases, isothermic expansion follows a PV curve rnrnP\propto \frac{1}{V}rnrnwhile adiabatic expansion follows a PV curve rnrnP\propto \frac{1}{V^{\gamma}}rnrnGiven that these curves start at the same point, because $\gamma>1$ it is pretty clear that the isothermic expansion curve will always be greater than the adiabatic PV curve, and hence does more work. The answer must be (E). Alternate Solution - Unverified
tau1777
2008-10-23 21:00:29
So my thermo teacher told us a neat trick that helps make this quicker. so if you realize that an adiabat connects to isotherms on the p-v diagrams. you can convince yourself that the isotherm covers more area. this is because the adiadat has to be steeper in order to connect the two isotherms, and therefore cover less areas. of course i keep mentioning area because work is the area of a curve on a p-v diagram. hope this helps.Alternate Solution - Unverified
Comments
yummyhat
2017-10-25 03:54:03
very similar to question #29 on the 2017 practice exam.NEC
physgre
2015-10-15 02:19:22
参考卡诺循环图Alternate Solution - Unverified
buaasyh
2014-10-17 02:29:43
In the adiabatic case, the gas lose tempreture because work has been done by the gas. In the isothermal case, the gas maintains tempreture so the presure is higher than the adiabatic case. Therefore, the work done in the isothermal case is more, i.e., $W_i>W_a$.Alternate Solution - Unverified
ProofbyInspection
2010-11-12 09:05:34
You just need to notice that for ideal gases, isothermic expansion follows a PV curve rnrnP\propto \frac{1}{V}rnrnwhile adiabatic expansion follows a PV curve rnrnP\propto \frac{1}{V^{\gamma}}rnrnGiven that these curves start at the same point, because $\gamma>1$ it is pretty clear that the isothermic expansion curve will always be greater than the adiabatic PV curve, and hence does more work. The answer must be (E). Alternate Solution - Unverified
meitnerium
2010-10-10 21:08:55
When you wrote
W_a = \frac{1}{1-\gamma} (P_1-2 P_2) V_1
how did you flip the sign from the original formula for work done by an adiabatic process, which is:
W_a = \frac{1}{1-\gamma} (P_2 V_2- P_1 V_1)
NEC
gryphia
2008-11-02 14:55:30
Unless I'm not totally mistaken, this problem can be thought of in the following way:

Work done by an ideal gas is just PdV. For an isotherm, the pressure decreases with 1/V (this comes right from the ideal gas equation, PV=NkT, so P=NkT/V, N and T are constant). For an adiabat, the pressure decreases with 1/V^\gamma. Now, \gamma=C_p/C_v and is greater than 1 for an ideal gas. So the pressure decreases more for the same volume change for an adiabat vs. an isotherm, thus the work done must be less for the adiabat.

This is equivalent to the work under the curve formulations people have offered above, but may help you if you can't remember the shape of the curves off the top of your head.
NEC
tau1777
2008-10-23 21:00:29
So my thermo teacher told us a neat trick that helps make this quicker. so if you realize that an adiabat connects to isotherms on the p-v diagrams. you can convince yourself that the isotherm covers more area. this is because the adiadat has to be steeper in order to connect the two isotherms, and therefore cover less areas. of course i keep mentioning area because work is the area of a curve on a p-v diagram. hope this helps.
NervousWreck
2017-03-28 09:12:16
This is a very good solution and I used it too.
Alternate Solution - Unverified
realcomfy
2008-10-19 04:12:34
How did you derive the equation for adiabatic work? I am getting lost on this step because I am not sure how the integration would work since we have both varying pressure and volume. ThanksNEC
QEDisGoodForMe
2008-10-12 19:54:46
Just want to say thank you to all who contribute to this website!! You are all amazing, especially Yosun!NEC
KarstenChu
2007-03-22 12:55:40
I think you meant to type P1V1=P2V2 for your derivation of the work done by an isothermal process.NEC
tdixon2
2006-09-12 03:26:40
Easier solution is to realise that the pressure is higher during the isothermal process since energy is added to the gas to keep a constant temperature. Thus dW=PdV is greater for the isothermal process as P is larger at every step and you don't even need to do any math ... hey presto. NEC
daschaich
2005-11-10 21:53:01
The all-important links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Adiabatic.png />
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isothermal_process />
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_process
Walter
2008-08-10 16:38:49
I agree with this poster - the graphs tell you everything you need to know.

In a quasi-static process, (and this condition is in the question), the adiabats are always steeper than the isotherms

The work done is the area under these curves so from a given starting point the work done by the isothermal expansion must be greater. You'd have a lot of fun following the mathematical approach in the time available, though it's good to see it!
NEC
keflavich
2005-11-10 11:03:39
How do you get from the equations for Wa and Wi to choice E? I had difficulty doing that without a calculator, since W_a = .555 P_1V_1 and W_i=.693P_1V_1. Are there any good approximations to use? Without the knowledge that adiabatic processes do less work than isothermal, I don\'t think there\'s a reasonable way to come to that answer.
daschaich
2005-11-10 21:47:43
The way I did it was to remember the PV (pressure vs. volume) diagrams for adiabatic and isothermal processes. I figure somebody's going to remember anything from introductory thermal physics, it's PV diagrams.

I recalled that the PV curves for adiabatic processes are steeper than those for isothermal processes. Since the work done by the gas is the area under the gas is the area under the curve (i.e., W_{done by gas} = \int_{V_i}^{V_f} P dV), we know that the magnitude of the work done by the isothermal process is greater than the magnitude of that done by the adiabatic process. Since V_f > V_i, we know both values are positive. Thus 0 < W_a < W_i -- (E).
yosun
2005-11-10 22:45:39
hi keflavich: in case you forgot what daschaich mentioned about the PV diagrams, you can deduce that the work done by an adiabatic process is less than that of an isothermal process like this:

for the adiabatic process, one has dq = 0, then from the first law, one has du = -dw. this means that the work is path independent (since the internal energy is). so, since it's not the same as the isothermal work (due to the calculations above), the path in the PV diagram might as well curve downwards more so that the area is less.
partha
2006-10-30 06:13:10
look at the p-v diagram for both isothermal and adiabetic process...the slope of the adiabetic curve is gamma times the slope of isothermal process.Therefore between the the initial and final volume the area under the isothermal curve is greater than the adiabetic curve ...since the area under the curve gives the work done so the work done in the isothermal process is greater...it takes a few seconds to compute the answer
jdgayles16
2010-05-28 12:49:13
I thought the work of an isothermic process is negative so should it be less than zero and the work of an adiabat
Answered Question!

Post A Comment!
You are replying to:
When you wrote W_a = \frac{1}{1-\gamma} (P_1-2 P_2) V_1 how did you flip the sign from the original formula for work done by an adiabatic process, which is: W_a = \frac{1}{1-\gamma} (P_2 V_2- P_1 V_1)

Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...