GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR8677 #63
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
Verbatim question for GR8677 #63
Electromagnetism}Method of Image Charge

The boundary condition at the conducting plane is V(0)=0. This doesn't mean that one can't put an ``image charge" a distance -D away on the other side of the plane to make the calculation easier. Making the directest straight line from the charge to the plane along the z axis, one gets the following image-charge potential:


The charge density for a grounded conducting plane is given by \rho=-\epsilon_0 \frac{\partial V}{\partial n}, where n is the direction of the directest straight line. The derivative is,

and thus, after combining terms, the density is


The problem wants the surface charge density a distance D away from the point charge. So, plug in \left(x^2+y^2+(z-d)^2\right)^{1.5}=(D^2)^{1.5} to get


See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
casseverhart13
2019-09-06 05:46:42
Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all people you actually know what you are talking approximately! Bookmarked. house paintingAlternate Solution - Unverified
nakib
2010-04-02 08:40:10
For grounded conductor E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}.

By symmetry of the problem [remember that you have an opposite 'image' charge at -d],

E = E_x = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{2q}{D^2}cos\theta = \frac{1}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{qd}{D^3}

Figure out \sigma. Choice (D) is the answer.

But one need not go through all these if (s)he notes that only (D) has the right units.
Alternate Solution - Unverified
kroner
2009-10-05 23:28:58
The conducting plate shields the far side from the electric field of the point charge so the field there is zero. On the near side close to the plate the parallel components are zero, and the perpendicular component should be double what's contributed by the point charge alone. So the field on the near side is
\vec{E} =  \frac{2q}{4\pi \epsilon D^2}\hat{n}cos\theta
where \theta is the angle from the perpendicular so cos\theta = d/D.

Applying Gauss's Law on a volume that contains a small area A of the plate,
\frac{Aqd}{2\pi \epsilon D^3} = A\sigma/\epsilon.
Alternate Solution - Unverified
irishroogie
2007-10-04 18:31:37
As erc pointed out, choice D is the only one with the correct units of charge over area.Alternate Solution - Unverified
Comments
casseverhart13
2019-09-06 05:46:42
Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all people you actually know what you are talking approximately! Bookmarked. house painting
danielsw98667
2019-10-21 06:33:35
Well, with the application of Gauss law the answer should be D. Villa Las Rocas
Alternate Solution - Unverified
gigadan
2013-09-29 13:10:15
How about we treat it as a dipole with d distance separation?

Then we know for sure answer has to contain qd
Also, the field of a dipole goes off by r^-3
gigadan
2013-09-29 13:12:39
I meant separation of 2d
So.. the 4pi would become 2pi as a result.
NEC
walczyk
2012-11-07 15:57:22
The official solution is very good except that it starts off with the wrong sign. The term with (z-d) is the original charge, and (z+d) is the mirror charge [remember, if you increase z you should move closer to the original charge], and we also are given that the particle has charge -q. Therefore the problem is missing a factor of -1, which explains the negative charge density given in the solution.NEC
mpdude8
2012-04-19 15:06:22
Dimensional analysis is your best friend on a 100 question exam.NEC
nakib
2010-04-02 08:40:10
For grounded conductor E = \frac{\sigma}{\epsilon_0}.

By symmetry of the problem [remember that you have an opposite 'image' charge at -d],

E = E_x = \frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{2q}{D^2}cos\theta = \frac{1}{2\pi\epsilon_{0}}\frac{qd}{D^3}

Figure out \sigma. Choice (D) is the answer.

But one need not go through all these if (s)he notes that only (D) has the right units.
Alternate Solution - Unverified
kroner
2009-10-05 23:28:58
The conducting plate shields the far side from the electric field of the point charge so the field there is zero. On the near side close to the plate the parallel components are zero, and the perpendicular component should be double what's contributed by the point charge alone. So the field on the near side is
\vec{E} =  \frac{2q}{4\pi \epsilon D^2}\hat{n}cos\theta
where \theta is the angle from the perpendicular so cos\theta = d/D.

Applying Gauss's Law on a volume that contains a small area A of the plate,
\frac{Aqd}{2\pi \epsilon D^3} = A\sigma/\epsilon.
Alternate Solution - Unverified
proctort
2009-10-05 12:49:16
What is "n is the direction of the directest straight line" supposed to mean?rnIs "directest" even a word?NEC
irishroogie
2007-10-04 18:31:37
As erc pointed out, choice D is the only one with the correct units of charge over area.
ramparts
2009-11-05 15:20:12
You can do this the hard way, or you can do this the smart way. Unfortunately, yosun's answers, while a huge help, are often far more complicated than they need be, and not particularly amenable to a 100-question multiple-choice test.
Alternate Solution - Unverified
RootMeanSquare
2006-11-25 11:50:18
?? I don't quite get the setup of this problem. lets say the plane lies in the xy plane, the V(0) = V(Z=0) or what? And in which direction is D supposed to point?

Sorry if this very stupid, but I really don't get the problem (aside from the imension analysis...)
NEC
eigenrosen
2006-10-27 12:22:42
And you can only combine the terms from the derivative after you plug in z=0 (the only place we would expect a surface charge).
tfw15
2008-10-10 19:26:00
Yeah the answer to this question definitely needs to be rewritten!
Typo Alert!
eigenrosen
2006-10-27 12:12:25
I think the signs of the charges are off in the potential (given the assumption that the negative charge in the problem is in the +z direction, which you make when you take the normal derivative in the +z direction). This should account for the sign difference with the answer.Typo Alert!
l3amm
2006-10-19 20:02:59
Alternatively, the only answer with the correct units is D. Simple, but little tricks can make hard problems really easy.NEC
erc
2005-11-05 11:20:57
My reasoning was that (D) was the only one where the combination of d's and D's gave something with units of a surface density.
Plantis
2010-04-06 11:49:19
Absolutly correct! I agree.
shak
2010-07-31 13:15:29
Compare answers with their units...all are eliminated except D which has unit of charge over area
NEC

Post A Comment!
You are replying to:
The official solution is very good except that it starts off with the wrong sign. The term with (z-d) is the original charge, and (z+d) is the mirror charge [remember, if you increase z you should move closer to the original charge], and we also are given that the particle has charge -q. Therefore the problem is missing a factor of -1, which explains the negative charge density given in the solution.

Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...