GR0177 #77
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
Ning Bao 2008-02-01 07:39:44 | Quick elimination: higher states are less likely->D or E.
Ratio of given energy to kT mist be important: as Energy of A increases, likelihood in state A decreases ->E. |  |
|
Comments |
gbenga 2014-10-18 22:35:18 | semi-fast soln: rn rnThis power is negative so A,B, & C are eliminated. The denominator is small so D is unlikely. Remaining is E |  | gbenga 2014-10-18 22:32:03 | semi-fast soln:
This power is negative so A,B, & C are eliminated. The denominator is small so D is unlikely. Remaining is E |  | QuantumCat 2014-09-01 10:39:10 | A quick way to solve this problem (knowing that the occupation number depends on the energy) is to say that state B is at zero energy so that the exponential for state B just becomes 1, which is infinitely easier to deal with. |  | Ning Bao 2008-02-01 07:39:44 | Quick elimination: higher states are less likely->D or E.
Ratio of given energy to kT mist be important: as Energy of A increases, likelihood in state A decreases ->E. |  |
|
Post A Comment! |
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
type this... |
to get... |
$\int_0^\infty$ |
 |
$\partial$ |
 |
$\Rightarrow$ |
 |
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
 |
$\sqrt{z}$ |
 |
$\langle my \rangle$ |
 |
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
_{me}) |
$\vec{E}$ |
 |
$\frac{a}{b}$ |
 |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|