GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR9677 #94
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
This problem is still being typed.
Statistical Mechanics}Internal Energy

The partition function is Z=\sum e^{-\epsilon_i/kT} = 1+e^{-\epsilon/kT}. Internal energy is given by U=\frac{NkT^2}{Z} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial T} \propto \frac{\epsilon e^{-\epsilon/kT}}{e^{-\epsilon/kT}+1}\propto \frac{\epsilon}{e^{\epsilon/kT}+1}, as in choice (D).

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one!
Comments
BerkeleyEric
2010-04-07 16:43:01
I think the fastest way to do this (other than memorizing it) is to consider the high- and low-temperature limits.

At very high T each state is equally likely so we expect the energy to be (N/2)E + (N/2)0 = NE/2. This eliminates (A), (B), and (C).

At very low T we expect the energy to be zero. This eliminates (E).
NEC
fjornada
2009-10-19 15:02:28
Note: that partition function is for a single system! For N particles:
Z=[1+e^{-\beta \epsilon}]^N

Anyway, I also recommend solving this question by taking the high temperature limit.
NEC
ramparts
2009-10-02 12:04:21
Hmm, so I got this right without knowing what a partition function even is, lol but I forget how. I think it was something like this. Let's look at T=0: E should go to 0, of course, so we can eliminate A and E. We expect there to be some sort of \epsilon dependence, so eliminate B. Of C and D, I've seen things that look like D in the little stat mech I've done more than I've seen things like C, but I don't know how to distinguish entirely ;) But then, if you can whittle it down to two and even guess, your chances are good - gaining a whole point vs losing a quarter.

I'd be curious to hear other ways of solving this without going into the full-on stat mech of it.
NEC
a19grey2
2008-10-30 23:15:42
Looking at the limits on T for this equation, how can D be the right answer?
As T goes to 0 the internal energy goes to infinity instead of some fixed value.
How is this possible?
schadenfraude
2008-11-02 13:40:20
As T goes to 0, e^(epsilon/kT) goes to infinity. Since infinity is in the denominator, the internal energy will go to zero, not infinity.
justguessing
2009-10-09 21:41:01
i've never done stat mech, but i exluded (D) cus in the limit of very high temperatures it goes to (N/2) * e ... I'd have thought that all states would be "excited" not just half of them. how do you account for that?
Muphrid
2009-10-10 04:42:25
In the high temperature limit, you can think of the two states as having roughly the same energy (that is, \epsilon / kT \approx 0) and thus, they're roughly equally occupied.

Ultimately, I find Richard's explanation easiest to remember: the energy of each subsystem is just a weighted sum (energy of a state times that state's Boltzmann factor), normalized to ensure that the probabilities sum to 1.
NEC
tonyhong
2008-10-05 01:57:09
what does "weakly interacting" mean? is it still valid to use the bolzman's partition function?NEC
Richard
2007-10-08 17:29:46
Forgive me a bit of pedantry:
The partition function Z is the sum over all the Boltzmann factors e^{-\beta E} and is used to normalize the relative probability given by a single Boltzmann factor. We use it to find how many of the N subsystems will be in the non-zero energy state:
The probability of being at the non-zero energy is:
e^{-\beta\epsilon} (1/Z)= \frac{e^{-\beta\epsilon}}{1+e^{-\beta\epsilon}
=\frac{1}{e^{\beta\epsilon}+1}
Multiply by N to get the total number of subsystems in the energy state, and then multiply by the energy \epsilon to get the total energy of the system:

\frac{N\epsilon}{e^{\beta\epsilon}+1},
which of course is (D).
NEC
antithesis
2007-10-05 07:35:53
I believe you can do this without remembering that equation for U. If you calculate the average U for each subsystem, multiply by N, you get U.

U_{tot} = N * \displaystyle\sum_i \epsilon_i e^{\frac{\epsilon_i}{kT}} / Z = N\epsilon e^{\frac{\epsilon}{kT}} / Z, cancel out the exponential in the numerator, and voila!
NEC
yosun
2005-11-21 00:49:45
astro_allison: the Z is supposed to be in the denominator. thanks for the typo alert; the typo's been fixed. NEC
astro_allison
2005-11-17 00:36:01
is the (dz/dt) supposed to be in the numerator or denominator?NEC

Post A Comment!
Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...


ShoutMix chat widget

1GHz Smartphone for 1 cent - best deal on a Samsung Galaxy Phone

Unlimited Access 24/7

Find Scholarships Today!

$3.4 Billion in Free Scholarships.

SL Button 125

Free 3D Virtual World. Largest User-Created Fantasy World. Don't Play, Experience. Join Now!

Bored, got time to kill, and want to earn micro-cash by mindlessly clicking on links? Join CrownGPT. Click Offers. Click the Paid to Click button... then click to your heart's delight.

90% Off + FREE SHIPPING!

FREE 3D Virtual World Chat - Join Second Life Today!