GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR9677 #86
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
This problem is still being typed.
Electromagnetism}Particle Trajectory


There is a force pointing upwards from the Electric field in the y-direction. Suppose the particle is initially moving upwards. Then, the magnetic field would deflect it towards the right... One can apply the Lorentz Force to solve this problem.

If the particle comes in from the left, then the magnetic force would initially deflect it downwards, while the electric force would always force it upwards. Continue applying this analysis to each diagram. It turns out that one has cycloid motion whenever the electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular.

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one!
Comments
PhyAnnie
2008-11-04 06:07:49
I was wondering... since the particle is always under the constant electric force of E*q upward, why the answer B doesn't show a upward trend, instead of being horizontal. That's strange.NEC
greed
2008-10-15 11:28:00
Doesn't the cycloid motion correspond to a drift velocity that is proportional to \vec{E}\times\vec{B}? This would make the drift in the x direction, but choice D shows a drift in y. little confused ...
greed
2008-10-15 11:30:34
oops, never mind: just checked the answers
NEC
cordercom
2008-10-05 17:58:59
I think we can use the Poynting vector in this case. The net flux of energy density and hence the net trajectory of the particle must be in the direction of E cross B= (y X z)=x. So, the net displacement of the particle must be toward the right. Answer (B) seems most appropriate.

See Griffiths, Intro to Electrodynamics 3rd Edition, pg 206 & 347
physicsisgod
2008-10-30 16:34:35
The Poynting vector describes the direction of energy propogation for the EM field. It says nothing about the energy of particles moving in the EM field. This is a lucky coincidence.
NEC
buddy.epson
2006-10-14 14:27:13
the +z direction is determined by the cross product of +x and +y (aka the right-hand-rule). NEC
andreas
2005-11-10 05:00:51
And for those who, like me, are confused by conventions, the magnetic field in the +z direction means it comes out of the page.

(I'm used to defining +z to be away from the observer, i.e. into the page)
NEC

Post A Comment!
Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...
Chat Archives | Delete left banner ad | Donate
(Click to view chat.)

Anonymous:

Hate being Anonymous? Login or Register

EssayEdge.com Admissions Essay Help Poser 7 - Complete 3D Figure Design

Upgrade to Poser 7 Now

Huge Textbook Selection, Low Prices – Phat Campus.

Google