|
GR9677 #8 |
|
|
Problem
|
|
|
This problem is still being typed. |
Mechanics }Damped Oscillations
One should remember that damped oscillations have decreasing amplitude according to an exponential envelope. As the amplitude shrinks, the period increases. The additional force instated in the problem is equivalent to damping, and thus the period increases, as in choice (A).
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
| There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one! |
|
|
Comments |
cobrachi 2008-10-31 22:14:48 | It's simple to think of this conceptually. The new force is in the opposite direction of the velocity so it will act against the motion of the particle. Thus, it decreases the angular frequency and since T=2pi/w --> a smaller w results in a larger T. |  | greenfruit 2008-10-31 08:36:12 | Question about the soln: Why can we conclude that as amplitude shrinks period increases? |  | gn0m0n 2008-10-20 01:22:45 | To echo a couple of questions and hopefully clarify them: do we mean that the period is greater than when it was undamped (ie, but still constant once it is damped) or do we mean it is changing in time once the damping is applied?
gn0m0n 2008-10-20 01:24:19 |
I'd like to ask the same thing about the amplitude.
|
|  | sharpstones 2007-04-02 19:45:51 | Just to tex it out. The general solution to a damped oscillator is: where where is the damping term and is the frequency of the solution
if omega is real (which is the underdamped case: ) you will have oscillations which do in fact have a constant period but will have decreasing amplitude from the . clearly the frequency will be less then the original frequency so the period will be greater.
sharpstones 2007-04-02 19:46:55 |
that should be 
|
blah22 2008-02-14 11:02:07 |
I'm confused. Why do you say you will have oscillations which have a constant period and in the next sentence say the frequency will clearly be less?
|
|  | huanggyellow 2007-03-20 07:28:47 | How about choice (E)? Surely the period is constantly changing (increasing)?
mhas035 2007-03-21 21:42:23 |
The frequency of an underdamped oscillator is omega = omega{undamped}*sqrt(1-b.^2/4mk), i.e. smaller than the undamped frequency, and constant.
|
|  |
|
| Post A Comment! |
|
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
| type this... |
to get... |
| $\int_0^\infty$ |
 |
| $\partial$ |
 |
| $\Rightarrow$ |
 |
| $\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
 |
| $\sqrt{z}$ |
 |
| $\langle my \rangle$ |
 |
| $\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
_{me}) |
| $\vec{E}$ |
 |
| $\frac{a}{b}$ |
 |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|
|