GREPhysics.NET
GR | # Login | Register
   
  GR8677 #63
Problem
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
Verbatim question for GR8677 #63
Electromagnetism}Method of Image Charge

The boundary condition at the conducting plane is V(0)=0. This doesn't mean that one can't put an ``image charge" a distance -D away on the other side of the plane to make the calculation easier. Making the directest straight line from the charge to the plane along the z axis, one gets the following image-charge potential:


The charge density for a grounded conducting plane is given by \rho=-\epsilon_0 \frac{\partial V}{\partial n}, where n is the direction of the directest straight line. The derivative is,

and thus, after combining terms, the density is


The problem wants the surface charge density a distance D away from the point charge. So, plug in \left(x^2+y^2+(z-d)^2\right)^{1.5}=(D^2)^{1.5} to get


See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
irishroogie
2007-10-04 18:31:37
As erc pointed out, choice D is the only one with the correct units of charge over area.Alternate Solution - Unverified
Comments
irishroogie
2007-10-04 18:31:37
As erc pointed out, choice D is the only one with the correct units of charge over area.Alternate Solution - Unverified
RootMeanSquare
2006-11-25 11:50:18
?? I don't quite get the setup of this problem. lets say the plane lies in the xy plane, the V(0) = V(Z=0) or what? And in which direction is D supposed to point?

Sorry if this very stupid, but I really don't get the problem (aside from the imension analysis...)
NEC
eigenrosen
2006-10-27 12:22:42
And you can only combine the terms from the derivative after you plug in z=0 (the only place we would expect a surface charge).
tfw15
2008-10-10 19:26:00
Yeah the answer to this question definitely needs to be rewritten!
Typo Alert!
eigenrosen
2006-10-27 12:12:25
I think the signs of the charges are off in the potential (given the assumption that the negative charge in the problem is in the +z direction, which you make when you take the normal derivative in the +z direction). This should account for the sign difference with the answer.Typo Alert!
l3amm
2006-10-19 20:02:59
Alternatively, the only answer with the correct units is D. Simple, but little tricks can make hard problems really easy.NEC
erc
2005-11-05 11:20:57
My reasoning was that (D) was the only one where the combination of d's and D's gave something with units of a surface density.NEC

Post A Comment!
Username:
Password:
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
 
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\int_0^\infty$
$\partial$
$\Rightarrow$
$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$
$\sqrt{z}$
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
$\vec{E}$
$\frac{a}{b}$
 
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...
Chat Archives | Delete left banner ad | Donate
(Click to view chat.)

Anonymous:

Hate being Anonymous? Login or Register

EssayEdge.com Admissions Essay Help Poser 7 - Complete 3D Figure Design

Upgrade to Poser 7 Now

Huge Textbook Selection, Low Prices – Phat Campus.

Google