|
GR8677 #63 |
|
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
irishroogie 2007-10-04 18:31:37 | As erc pointed out, choice D is the only one with the correct units of charge over area. |  |
|
|
Comments |
irishroogie 2007-10-04 18:31:37 | As erc pointed out, choice D is the only one with the correct units of charge over area. |  | RootMeanSquare 2006-11-25 11:50:18 | ?? I don't quite get the setup of this problem. lets say the plane lies in the xy plane, the V(0) = V(Z=0) or what? And in which direction is D supposed to point?
Sorry if this very stupid, but I really don't get the problem (aside from the imension analysis...) |  | eigenrosen 2006-10-27 12:22:42 | And you can only combine the terms from the derivative after you plug in z=0 (the only place we would expect a surface charge).
tfw15 2008-10-10 19:26:00 |
Yeah the answer to this question definitely needs to be rewritten!
|
|  | eigenrosen 2006-10-27 12:12:25 | I think the signs of the charges are off in the potential (given the assumption that the negative charge in the problem is in the +z direction, which you make when you take the normal derivative in the +z direction). This should account for the sign difference with the answer. |  | l3amm 2006-10-19 20:02:59 | Alternatively, the only answer with the correct units is D. Simple, but little tricks can make hard problems really easy. |  | erc 2005-11-05 11:20:57 | My reasoning was that (D) was the only one where the combination of d's and D's gave something with units of a surface density. |  |
|
| Post A Comment! |
|
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
| type this... |
to get... |
| $\int_0^\infty$ |
 |
| $\partial$ |
 |
| $\Rightarrow$ |
 |
| $\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
 |
| $\sqrt{z}$ |
 |
| $\langle my \rangle$ |
 |
| $\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
_{me}) |
| $\vec{E}$ |
 |
| $\frac{a}{b}$ |
 |
|
|
|
|
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it... |
|
|
|