GR | # Login | Register
  GR8677 #21
GREPhysics.NET Official Solution    Alternate Solutions
Verbatim question for GR8677 #21
Special Relativity}Metric

Recall that the metric dS^2=-dt^2+dr^2 (equivalently, dS^2=dt^2-dr^2)

dr^2 = dx_i dx_i= (dx)^2+(dy)^2+(dz)^2=4+0+4=8 and dt^2=4. Thus dS^2=4, and S=2, as in choice (C).

See below for user comments and alternate solutions! See below for user comments and alternate solutions!
Alternate Solutions
There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one!
2012-04-15 20:29:10
As the original poster points out, this boils down to finding the distance between two points (sqrt((x1 - x2)^2 + (y1-y2)^2 + (z1-z2)^2) - (t1-t2)^2). The only part is remembering to subtract the change in time, rather than add.NEC
2008-10-17 13:28:48
So this is all about how the interval ds is invariant because c is the same in all inertial systems in relative motion, right? So the relations are given as follows.

\Delta s^{2} = \Delta r^{2} - c^{2} \Delta t^{2} = 0

\Delta {s'}^{2} = \Delta {r'}^{2} - c^{2} \Delta {t'}^{2} = 0

\Delta {s}^{2} = \Delta {s'}^{2}

So how on Earth do you manage to get rid of the c^{2}? I've tried redefining dt as

\Delta t = \frac{\Delta r}{v}

or using the length contraction eq.

L = \frac{L_{0}}{\gamma}

Both get me closer to 2 compared to the other given answers, but nothing I can think of can give me an exact answer of two. As for the answer explanation here, I am just fairly uncomfortable with the idea that adding two different units together can get the correct answer.
2008-10-18 07:03:30
The problem tells you to use units such that the speed of light is 1.This is how you "get rid" of c^2 (couldn't manage the syntax for that).

As for the different units,if c=1 then (m/s)=1 \Rightarrow m=s

Answered Question!
2006-12-01 04:32:27
If you use the equation for the interval in paranthesis (equivalenty ... ) you get -4, upon which the length becomes imaginary. Maybe only the first equation is appropriate?
2006-12-01 14:01:01
Note that imaginary numbers are just another tool to use when doing relativity calculations. You can either use a metric or use imaginary numbers. Both views are valid.
2006-09-09 12:06:07
The other thing you need to recall in order to do this problem quickly is that the spacetime interval between two events is invariant, i.e. it does not depend on the reference frame. By asking what the interval is in the O' frame I think the problem is trying to trick you into transforming the events into that frame before calculating the interval.
2007-10-05 13:56:18
I agree, although one should arrive at the correct answer after Lorentz-transforming the events, it would just be a big waste of time. Which is just the kind of evil trick ETS likes.
2008-10-13 08:11:29
agree with both of you. The key fact here is to remember that space-time intervals are invariant.
2010-09-20 06:26:00
the key fact is that ETS likes evil tricks :)
2010-11-01 08:52:54
I dont think this is an evil trick, on the contrary, it is a fundamental concept that the metric is invariant for all inertial reference frames.

Post A Comment!
Click here to register.
This comment is best classified as a: (mouseover)
Mouseover the respective type above for an explanation of each type.

Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
type this... to get...
$\langle my \rangle$
$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$
The Sidebar Chatbox...
Scroll to see it, or resize your browser to ignore it...