|
GR0177 #68
|
|
|
|
|
Alternate Solutions |
jmason86 2009-07-14 22:32:55 | The quick-thinking, time-pressure solution that I did was:
(A) decay would change the atomic number nucleon number from 7.
decay explains the p->n transformation but requires two particles to be emitted (e+/e- and / bar)
(B) (C) (D) do not satisfy this
Only (E) remains. Electron capture is also basically an odd form of beta decay.. all the particles involved are the same, the equation just changes a bit. |  |
|
|
Comments |
jmason86 2009-07-14 22:36:23 | Sorry that was sloppy. Here it is again:
The quick-thinking, time-pressure solution that I did was:
(A) decay would change the nucleon number from 7.
decay explains the p->n transformation but requires two particles to be emitted (e+/e- and / bar)
(B) (C) (D) do not satisfy this
Only (E) remains. Electron capture is also basically an odd form of beta decay.. all the particles involved are the same, the equation just changes a bit.
|  | jmason86 2009-07-14 22:32:55 | The quick-thinking, time-pressure solution that I did was:
(A) decay would change the atomic number nucleon number from 7.
decay explains the p->n transformation but requires two particles to be emitted (e+/e- and / bar)
(B) (C) (D) do not satisfy this
Only (E) remains. Electron capture is also basically an odd form of beta decay.. all the particles involved are the same, the equation just changes a bit. |  | Poop Loops 2008-11-01 20:25:10 | I did this by process of elimination since a particle class is only offered spring quarter senior year at my school...
So:
(A) Alpha particle is a helium nucleus. This won't get us anywhere because helium has 2 protons and we are only dropping our Z (number of protons) by one.
(B) This will simply ionize the particle, so it will still be Be, but with a positive charge. No good.
(C) This will lower the mass, but our mass stays constant here. Further, this won't lower the Z number. Nope.
(D) A positron is the anti-particle of the electron. It is exactly like the electron except it has positive charge. You don't get these in run-of-the-mill atoms, so you can throw this away. But, even if you weren't sure, you can still tell that the Z number won't go down because that refers specifically to protons.
(E) Eh? I don't know what this is. Sure, let's go with this. The little bit I do know says that Neutrons are Protons and Electrons combined together, so that helps. |  | abby 2007-10-29 10:26:09 | isn't an alpha particle a helium atom with 2neutrons and 2protons? why does the answer say 4neutrons.. (typo?)
mrbojeebers 2007-10-29 22:25:21 |
Appears to be a typo. Perhaps it was meant 4 nucleons. And not to be a stickler over niggling details, but traditionally one denotes the atomic number with letter and mass or nucleon number with letter (i.e. the symbols and are typically swapped in your -decay equations.)
|
|  |
|
| Post A Comment! |
|
|
Bare Basic LaTeX Rosetta Stone
|
LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex., $\alpha^2_0$ produces .
|
| type this... |
to get... |
| $\int_0^\infty$ |
 |
| $\partial$ |
 |
| $\Rightarrow$ |
 |
| $\ddot{x},\dot{x}$ |
 |
| $\sqrt{z}$ |
 |
| $\langle my \rangle$ |
 |
| $\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$ |
_{me}) |
| $\vec{E}$ |
 |
| $\frac{a}{b}$ |
 |
|
|
|
|
|