GR 8677927796770177 | # Login | Register

GR8677 #32
Problem
 GREPhysics.NET Official Solution Alternate Solutions

Quantum Mechanics$\Rightarrow$}Photoelectric Effect

(A) The photoelectric effect was derived before formal quantum mechanics and that angular momentum mess came along. Moreover, electron orbits don't really apply to the valance electron sea.

(B) This is true, but it doesn't help derive the photoelectric effect.

(C) Nah, there's also something weird called electron-electron annihilation. Basically, two electrons crash into each other and a photon is created. (Perhaps some other particles, too.) Also, think of your regular desktop lamp---light is emitted, but the electrons are probably not jumping between orbits.

(D) Right. Einstein won the Nobel Prize about a hundred years ago via his proposal that photons have quantized energy $E=h\nu$.

(E) As a pure-ideal theory, the photoelectric effect depends on a single photon exciting a single electron. It favors the particle view of light. Choice (E) is out.

Alternate Solutions
 There are no Alternate Solutions for this problem. Be the first to post one!
fredluis
2019-08-09 04:49:31
There is no \"negative value of at which the current stops.\" Any negative voltage would attract all the free electrons so there would always be a current. remodeling
joshuaprice153
2019-08-09 03:00:35
The author has written an excellent article. You made your point and not much to discuss. It\'s like this universal truth that you can not argue with the truth is not universal, everything has its exception. Thanks for this information. Kitchen Remodeling of Central Florida
blue_down_quark
2008-08-22 06:00:53
There's no such thing as electron-electron annihilation AFAIK. If it existed all the atoms in the universe would turn into nuclei and radiation (losing their electrons).
But there's an interaction called electron-positron annihilation.
 FortranMan2008-10-19 16:04:17 Plus the wording is too broad for (C), it could be just as well be a valence electron between atoms.
 russian2017-08-12 13:55:10 Charge would not be conserved in e-e- -> gamma. But yes, e+e- -> gamma is common (pair production). There are questions related to the pair production energy on the pGRE

LaTeX syntax supported through dollar sign wrappers $, ex.,$\alpha^2_0$produces $\alpha^2_0$. type this... to get...$\int_0^\infty$$\int_0^\infty$$\partial$$\partial$$\Rightarrow$$\Rightarrow$$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$$\ddot{x},\dot{x}$$\sqrt{z}$$\sqrt{z}$$\langle my \rangle$$\langle my \rangle$$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$$\left( abacadabra \right)_{me}$$\vec{E}$$\vec{E}$$\frac{a}{b}\$ $\frac{a}{b}$